Quote (Du$tin @ Thu - Apr 15 2010 - 23:30:32)
Quote (RewtheBrave @ Thu - Apr 15 2010 - 22:41:45)
Quote (Du$tin @ Thu - Apr 15 2010 - 17:36:09)
Yeah can't wait for them to pick kwame brown II again...
hi i`m kwame. i was supposed to be the next lebron but the difference is that i suck at sports
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Apr 15 2010 - 17:47:05)
bulls over cavs
tbh the bulls are a better team than they appear going by standings but unless rose has a HUGE series they have 0 chance. the 2-2 regular season series means nothing. the bulls are a team that could become really good with a few moves. if they`d missed the playoffs they might`ve had a better draft etc.
rose is a good player and all but he can't possibly stop lebron, and lets be honest the bulls wouldn't even be the 12th best team in the west
i agree. i think rose gives them an outside chance but the bulls don't have enough firepower. they've got some talent and they can play defense, but they aren't really ready and they don't have enough depth, especially at each position. i can see them stealing a game or two but i predict a sweep by the cavs. the bulls have a lot of heart and they have the ability to rebound and play defense, which can give any team a little trouble, especially with rose's ability to flat-out play.
donno-ish stuff:
i don't know if i'd say they aren't good enough to sit 12th in the west, but the west is pretty loaded. i'd say that the bulls probably compare well with a team like houston. oklahoma has brighter prospects than the bulls, but the bulls are a team with potential. a lot of teams (san antonio being the most obvious case, next to phoenix and boston) have to worry about losing potential because they're getting older, etc. a well-managed bulls team could be looking at 3rd/4th in the east next year, and if they were in the west, probably fighting for playoff position. in the east, ny and toronto and probably the two teams to look for in terms of beating out the bulls next year. the bulls are iffy but i think that if they'd played better they'd look better coming out of the east. i don't think they're deep enough to do serious damage.
east/west stuff:
everyone always talks about how great the west is, but i don't think they're as overpowered as one might think. the west is a deeper division, but after denver there's a huge dropoff in the west. san antonio is good when they're at the best, but they're in serious decline. portland is a mixed bag, utah is a would-be great team that just isn't quite there. there's all about williams. boozer this, boozer that, he's a match up player who can't dominate the post against good opposition. milsap is good, kirilenko is aight, korver has eagle eye implants etc but they aren't as good as they seem (imo). sad to say i think a team like th heat would match up ok against them if wade goes nuts. a healthy bucks team would be a challenge for the jizz/jazz. oklahoma city has BIG prospects, and they're better than they seem (much like the bucks in the east...if the bucks can add some depth, look the f*ck out).
moreover at the top tier the east is stronger. don't give me lakers this and lakers that. the cavs are the best team in the nba this year. and i'll grant that kobe bryant is so much better than lebron james that the comparisons actually annoy me (but lebron is a physical freak and he IS talented--and getting better). dallas and the suns should just get married. they're both teams that are built to do well in the regular season and then disappoint in the playoffs. denver is LEGIT, i think they're better than the mavs and the suns, but i think they must lack a little chemistry or something. they have a great coach, so the blame has to go on players in the nuggest organization. billups and melo are fantastic, though. i think they're a MUCH better combo than williams and boozer, mainly because melo is so much better than boozer. boozer and overrated are synonymous. orlando, atlanta and (aging) boston are all legit, serious contenders. this is how i'd look at the east vs west in terms of how good they really are, ignoring actual depth:
east teams with a "chance" to win it all:
1. cleveland
2. orlando
3. atlanta
4. boston
west teams with a "chance" to win it all:
1. fakers
2. nuggets
i'd say the jazz and suns are the "chance in hell" teams from the west, but i don't see them as legit contenders.
enough of this west domination stuff
This post has been edited by RewtheBrave on Fri - Apr 16 2010 - 10:43:03