DesolateCarnage.net
Members | Search
Desolate Carnage
Hey Guest
Options Menu
DC Forums → Sports → Fantasy Football?
Page 9 of 12 - «78 9 1011»
 
Fantasy Football?
Views: 29884 | Replies: 593 | Started 12 years, 5 months ago
        Top  
#854086 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 09:58:36
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
9
        Top  
#854087 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 10:01:24
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb. just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?
        Top  
#854088 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 10:15:09
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up
        Top  
#854089 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 10:22:32
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
also maybe a 3-team trade with evan would be possible
        Top  
#854093 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:15:19
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 08:15:09)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up


you want an elite player and not offer an elite player?
thats the point. mannnings value is not one based off of his standing as my backup. hes 6th overall in points this season. just because i happen to have the #2 overall ahead of him does not make his value that of a backup. you know this, man.
        Top  
#854094 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:19:03
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:15:19)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 08:15:09)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up


you want an elite player and not offer an elite player?
thats the point. mannnings value is not one based off of his standing as my backup. hes 6th overall in points this season. just because i happen to have the #2 overall ahead of him does not make his value that of a backup. you know this, man.


is anyone else in a position to trade for him? you can keep a top 5 qb as your backup if you think thats worth more than my offers
        Top  
#854095 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:23:12
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
gary, dan, or lance are the only people who would use peyton as a starter, and any trade stock they have will be sacrificing more points than the upgrade at qb they get
        Top  
#854096 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:24:41
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 09:19:03)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:15:19)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 08:15:09)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up


you want an elite player and not offer an elite player?
thats the point. mannnings value is not one based off of his standing as my backup. hes 6th overall in points this season. just because i happen to have the #2 overall ahead of him does not make his value that of a backup. you know this, man.


is anyone else in a position to trade for him? you can keep a top 5 qb as your backup if you think thats worth more than my offers


i cant even believe you think you are justified in asking for the 6th highest scoring player of the season and in return you offer not a single player that will start. yes, ill keep him on my bench because you dont think he is worth a wr that has half of mannings season points. im baffled you think manning is a backup value player.
        Top  
#854097 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:26:00
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:24:41)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 09:19:03)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:15:19)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 08:15:09)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up


you want an elite player and not offer an elite player?
thats the point. mannnings value is not one based off of his standing as my backup. hes 6th overall in points this season. just because i happen to have the #2 overall ahead of him does not make his value that of a backup. you know this, man.


is anyone else in a position to trade for him? you can keep a top 5 qb as your backup if you think thats worth more than my offers


i cant even believe you think you are justified in asking for the 6th highest scoring player of the season and in return you offer not a single player that will start. yes, ill keep him on my bench because you dont think he is worth a wr that has half of mannings season points. im baffled you think manning is a backup value player.


peytons the sixth highest scorer of the season
i was offering you the seventh highest scorer of the season as part of the deal
??
        Top  
#854098 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:28:04
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
its a slight upgrade vs a slight downgrade for both of us, i dont get it
        Top  
#854099 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:28:24
smoked*
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:28:04)
its a slight upgrade vs a slight downgrade for both of us, i dont get it


nobody wants to help your team
        Top  
#854101 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:33:05
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 09:26:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:24:41)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 09:19:03)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:15:19)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 08:15:09)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:01:24)
in reality manning is a top 5-7 qb.  just because i happen to have 2 top 5-7 qbs i should trade one at a value of a backup?


value isnt a binary starter or backup, i offered better than for a backup and even included a great backup qb with it, but that was the best i could offer without it being an elite player

maybe after this weeks games some of our players values will change and something thats more fair will come up


you want an elite player and not offer an elite player?
thats the point. mannnings value is not one based off of his standing as my backup. hes 6th overall in points this season. just because i happen to have the #2 overall ahead of him does not make his value that of a backup. you know this, man.


is anyone else in a position to trade for him? you can keep a top 5 qb as your backup if you think thats worth more than my offers


i cant even believe you think you are justified in asking for the 6th highest scoring player of the season and in return you offer not a single player that will start. yes, ill keep him on my bench because you dont think he is worth a wr that has half of mannings season points. im baffled you think manning is a backup value player.


peytons the sixth highest scorer of the season
i was offering you the seventh highest scorer of the season as part of the deal
??


why would i want to exchange my backup qb for your qb? thats not logical. for me to trade you something you kinda have to offer something i might need. exchanging backups is not something i need.
w/e, ill trade manning to whoever you are playing
        Top  
#854102 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:34:12
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:28:04)
its a slight upgrade vs a slight downgrade for both of us, i dont get it


bears defense 125 points on the season, 15.6 per week
green bay defense 59 points on the season, 8.4 per week
difference of 7.2
bears d would become your starter, +7.2 points

manning 230 points, 32.8 per week
ben 212 points, 26.5 per week
difference of 6.3
ben roethlisberger would be on your bench where peyton was, difference of 0 points

how is that trade a negative for you

        Top  
#854103 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:41:10
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
plus the fact that green bay still has their bye week, and i offered a bench/depth rb as well
        Top  
#854106 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:01:31
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:23:12)
gary, dan, or lance are the only people who would use peyton as a starter, and any trade stock they have will be sacrificing more points than the upgrade at qb they get


nope
who needs peyton when theres eli
BAYBEEEE
        Top  
#854107 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:02:33
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
but on a serious note
regardless of how much better peyton might be than eli, or any other QB: everyone needs WR
        Top  
#854108 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:03:02
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
is vick an upgrade from roflsburger?
        Top  
#854109 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:05:00
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:03:02)
is vick an upgrade from roflsburger?


monday night might be the last game vick plays this season, too much of a risk to be a fantasy qb, but that being said he is averaging just over 27 points per week
        Top  
#854110 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:06:12
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:02:33)
but on a serious note
regardless of how much better peyton might be than eli, or any other QB: everyone needs WR


yeah, its a lot easier to have 1 good quarterback than 3 consistent wide receivers
        Top  
#854113 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:11:22
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:06:12)
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:02:33)
but on a serious note
regardless of how much better peyton might be than eli, or any other QB: everyone needs WR


yeah, its a lot easier to have 1 good quarterback than 3 consistent wide receivers


disagree
a mediocre QB puts up 15-25 points
3 mediocre WR put up like 6-12 points combined
        Top  
#854114 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:13:31
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:11:22)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:06:12)
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:02:33)
but on a serious note
regardless of how much better peyton might be than eli, or any other QB: everyone needs WR


yeah, its a lot easier to have 1 good quarterback than 3 consistent wide receivers


disagree
a mediocre QB puts up 15-25 points
3 mediocre WR put up like 6-12 points combined


thats my point

you can pick up a free agent qb and start him and get 20 points, if you pick up a free agent wr, youre probably looking at 0-5 points
trading away a wr who is good for 15 points per week consistently is a big loss
        Top  
#854120 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:27:30
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
in short, its retarded to have 3 wr starting slots
        Top  
#854121 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:31:22
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:27:30)
in short, its retarded to have 3 wr starting slots


Truth
        Top  
#854122 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:33:47
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (MoS. @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:31:22)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:27:30)
in short, its retarded to have 3 wr starting slots


Truth


is that the default on yahoo or did our shit commish change it to 3?
        Top  
#854124 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:55:58
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:13:31)
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:11:22)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:06:12)
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:02:33)
but on a serious note
regardless of how much better peyton might be than eli, or any other QB: everyone needs WR


yeah, its a lot easier to have 1 good quarterback than 3 consistent wide receivers


disagree
a mediocre QB puts up 15-25 points
3 mediocre WR put up like 6-12 points combined


thats my point

you can pick up a free agent qb and start him and get 20 points, if you pick up a free agent wr, youre probably looking at 0-5 points
trading away a wr who is good for 15 points per week consistently is a big loss


oh, right
sorry, i read your previous reply backwards
        Top  
#854125 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:56:52
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
stupid question, but
can commish change the positions in the middle of the season?
        Top  
#854127 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:02:01
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:56:52)
stupid question, but
can commish change the positions in the middle of the season?


doubt it, thats something you need to know before the draft
        Top  
#854130 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:26:49
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
bears D is delivering again
        Top  
#854136 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:36:57
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
really dont like how yahoo doesnt show the summary of how your player earned the points, just the number of points they have

is it that hard to show xx yards - xx tds next to the player
        Top  
#854137 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:49:56
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:26:49)
bears D is delivering again


        Top  
#854138 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:55:06
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
31 points bears D in the 1st quarter
every week with this randomtask bullshit
        Top  
#854139 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:00:18
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:55:06)
31 points bears D in the 1st quarter
every week with this randomtask bullshit


defences get 10 points at the start of the game for holding the other team to zero points so far

titans have 2 points which i thin is still 7 points for the defense, so the bears d have really only scored 24 points in the first quarter
        Top  
#854146 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:11:36
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
oh, ok

User Image
        Top  
#854148 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:20:11
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
being tongue-in-cheek, somewhat because of joe refusing my trades for the bears d earlier this morning
        Top  
#854150 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:21:19
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 15:20:11)
being tongue-in-cheek, somewhat because of joe refusing my trades for the bears d earlier this morning


read this just as bears force another fumble turnover
        Top  
#854153 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:24:20
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
mikel leshoure is keeping you in it, damn
        Top  
#854158 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:46:30
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:20:11)
being tongue-in-cheek, somewhat because of joe refusing my trades for the bears d earlier this morning


i had no idea this was your objective
        Top  
#854159 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 14:58:43
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:33:47)
Quote (MoS. @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:31:22)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:27:30)
in short, its retarded to have 3 wr starting slots


Truth


is that the default on yahoo or did our shit commish change it to 3?


no idea, can't be legit, 2 WR's with a flex is pretty much the norm

i have always used ESPN

most of the reason i havent managed my team is because of how much i cant stand yahoo's interface for fantasy
        Top  
#854162 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 15:09:09
lobb
Group: Members
Posts: 11,60310k
Joined: Mar 31 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 351.45
Quote (MoS. @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 11:58:43)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:33:47)
Quote (MoS. @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:31:22)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:27:30)
in short, its retarded to have 3 wr starting slots


Truth


is that the default on yahoo or did our shit commish change it to 3?


no idea, can't be legit, 2 WR's with a flex is pretty much the norm

i have always used ESPN

most of the reason i havent managed my team is because of how much i cant stand yahoo's interface for fantasy


truth. yahoo fantasy is only good for basketball
        Top  
#854187 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 17:45:43
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
got a total of 0.8 points from 2 receivers in other league
        Top  
#854191 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 18:54:13
___*
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
doug martin 51 points
go fuck yourself
        Top  
#854194 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 19:35:07
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 18:45:43)
got a total of 0.8 points from 2 receivers in other league


doug martin outscored my entire team
        Top  
#854195 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 19:36:36
smoked*
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
gonna lose, gdamnit
        Top  
#854197 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 19:41:20
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 13:01:31)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 12:23:12)
gary, dan, or lance are the only people who would use peyton as a starter, and any trade stock they have will be sacrificing more points than the upgrade at qb they get


nope
who needs peyton when theres eli
BAYBEEEE


2 terrible eli weeks in a row
        Top  
#854198 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 20:11:31
smoked*
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
I think im going to the sacko
        Top  
#854199 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 20:12:25
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (smoked @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 21:11:31)
I think im going to the sacko


nah, lance
        Top  
#854205 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 22:17:34
StQ*
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Pork and Provolone 105.9
I'm a Cobb You Idiot 104.7

he has Turner playing, I have Rodgers playing and McCoy tomorrow. 7-2 BAYBEEE?!
        Top  
#854206 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 22:18:23
StQ*
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (StQ @ Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 22:17:34)
Pork and Provolone 105.9
I'm a Cobb You Idiot 104.7

he has Turner playing, I have Rodgers playing and McCoy tomorrow.  7-2 BAYBEEE?!


thank you Jay Cutler, enjoy your foray into free agency next week :
        Top  
#854208 | Sun - Nov 4 2012 - 23:07:55
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
starter: luck
bench: cutler
        Top  
#854210 | Mon - Nov 5 2012 - 00:14:18
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
losing my money league by 3 to my step dad
comes down to maclin v celek tomorrow
cool
Views: 29884 | Replies: 593 | Sports Topic List
Page 9 of 12 - «78 9 1011»
 
Quit the Internet
DC Forums powered by ___ and 3rror.org © 2006-2015