Group: Guest
Posts: 1,945
Joined: Sep 20 2009
Contact:
Offline PMPoints:
1,290.50
but i do. just got Chronicles (songs from their start until about 1990). on the 2nd disc, enjoying it. they keep changing styles, and it doesn't become super-apparent unless you don't pay attention to the vocals. then the songs are pretty clearly divided into stages.
i also promised myself to listen to DT because gary and gull like them, and they got me listening to tool again (and they got me to decide to get an rs membership, which is neither here nor there in terms of music).
bonus material: some guy described rush as heavy metal and i'm still trying to see it. not happening so far. i see them as a kind of alt/indie rock that sort of changes when their tools change (instrumental changes over time to go with the times without being typical of the times). and at some point they got into openly criticizing the times. i don't know if i like that as much, because music has an opportunity to push off the times, change them, or say something about them without making it obvious. like animal farm, which is not obvious to non-idiots (but to me the the /fail was when the animals started doing the talking for people, when sadly it would've been better if the book had dropped all the parallels and the animals altogether).
Group: Guest
Posts: 1,945
Joined: Sep 20 2009
Contact:
Offline PMPoints:
1,290.50
0-1 topics per topic pls rew.
Group: Members
Posts: 18,444
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact:
Offline PMPoints:
3,262.32
Monday's warrior mean mean stride...today's Tom Sawyer mean mean pride.
Group: Members
Posts: 74,198
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact:
Offline PMPoints:
6,883.75
they represent the good side of the terrible stadium rock era