Quote (randomtask @ Thu - Nov 28 2013 - 05:03:01)
Quote (MoS. @ Thu - Nov 28 2013 - 04:49:21)
Quote (MoS. @ Thu - Nov 28 2013 - 04:41:40)
you're mad that i didn't help you win at monopoly
grow up
joe and mac turned each other down in trades numerous times throughout the game, they didn't act butt hurt like a 12 year old
they felt that the trades made themselves better at the time; what did i think about them? i wouldn't have done them, i almost never trade in monopoly, the first 2-3 trips around the board usually determine a game, but i thought that they both went to aggressive too early, but they both made plays they thought would increase their chances to winning
i had no realistic chance at winning that game, my first 2-3 trips around the board were brutal, i had no squares
you made me offers that i did clearly feel were going to benefit me in the long run; you can act like a prick with your feeling that you are better then everyone all that you want, but the point is, you were upset because i didnt give you what YOU WANTED, i'm sorry you feel that way, and you can spin it whatever way that you want to make yourself feel superior, but at the end of the day, you're trying to make deals to BENEFIT yourself, clearly ME
if in fact the deal benefits us BOTH, that is clearly something that i am in any way, shape, or form, compelled to HAVE TO DO, the way that you see it
joe and mac turned down some trades, correct
you are wrong about monopoly strategy (who cares)
you are wrong about your chances to win the game (big news here, surrender at 20 minutes), and that attitude is the entire problem
i guess you could be correct about the trade offers clearly benefitting you if thats what you believed, that ties in to being wrong about the strategy
you are wrong about what i was upset about, i explained that in the last 20 poops
youre correct i was trying to make deals to benefit myself (that is the point), they did benefit you, you are wrong to think they didnt
and yes, if its a mutually beneficial trade you are strategically obligated to do it, again, thats the point of the game
anything else
my strat, your strat, clearly the same, opinion this, opinion that, "you're wrong because i say so"
you had by far the best property spread in the game (properties around most corners, ALL 4 RAILROADS which you refused to give up, EVER), and over double anyone else's liquid cash at the time you started your badgering about this trade, just because you wanted my properties, and i didnt want to give them to you, you had the most massive fit i've seen over a game of monopoly since i last played it with a 12 year old
i am well aware that you are upset that i didn't HELP YOU; for whatever reason, you somehow think that i am contractually/strategically/etc obligated to put my own foot into a grave while playing a game that YOU wanted to win; this isn't a team game, so stop trying to act like it was in MY best interest to help you; i told you that i was more than happy to have gone bankrupt and you could buy the properties up at that time
you can throw up whatever defense you want to use, blame it on my attitude, whatever, that's just the easy fallback route you're going to take each and every time anyway
this is literally the most ridiculous argument you could ever have come up with: "you didn't help me to win quicker, so you have a bad attitude and nobody likes you"
well, ok, i'm just glad that you won, i'd have hated to see the shit storm that would have came if you lost