DesolateCarnage.net
Members | Search
Desolate Carnage
Hey Guest
Options Menu
DC Forums → General Archive → Puzzle
Poll
Please login to view the contents of this poll.
 
Puzzle
Archived | Views: 2705 | Replies: 25 | Started 10 years, 10 months ago
 
#877140 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 12:59:17
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Assume:

1. For any x and any y, if x loves y then y loves x.
2. There exists an x such that for any y, x loves y.

If the previous statements are true, which of the following must be true:

A. Someone loves everyone
B. Everyone loves someone
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B

This post has been edited by nakedsalmon on Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:06:59
 
#877141 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:08:50
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
i love nick, but i am clearly in love with nick
you cant explain that
 
#877143 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:12:56
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Clue (translated premise)

1. If anyone loves anyone, that person loves them back
2. Can't make this too easy now..
 
#877144 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:38:46
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:08:50)
i love nick, but i am clearly in love with nick
you cant explain that


 
#877145 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:40:28
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Quote (blind_chief @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:08:50)
i love nick, but i am clearly in love with nick


if this statement were added as a third premise, then A, B, C, and D would all be true simultaneously

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

This post has been edited by nakedsalmon on Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:41:20
 
#877146 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:56:46
Sgull*
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
philosophy is so retarded
who cares
 
#877149 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 14:24:06
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Quote (Sgull @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:56:46)
philosophy is so retarded
who cares


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi

also, red herring
 
#877151 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:05:05
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
both a and b
this is like a 9th grade problem
are you jp
 
#877155 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:31:15
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Quote (randomtask @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:05:05)
both a and b
this is like a 9th grade problem
are you jp


I ain't playin' fool.

Too easy for you?

How about this one:

Assume:

1. Gary likes Nick.
2. There exists exactly one z such that for all x there exists a y such that if y likes x or x likes y then z likes x.

If the previous statements are true, which of the following must be true:

A. Exactly one person likes Gary.
B. Exactly one person likes everyone.
C. Only Gary likes Nick.
D. None of the above.

This post has been edited by nakedsalmon on Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:32:23
 
#877156 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:33:57
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
What the hell is going on?
 
#877157 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:36:58
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:33:57)
What the hell is going on?


2. ∃!z ∀x (∃y (L(x,y) v L(y,x) -> L(z,x))
 
#877158 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:45:38
Sgull*
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
i wonder how disappointed jps rich parents are that they raised a philosophy major and a retarded little brother
 
#877160 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:55:49
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (Sgull @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 15:45:38)
i wonder how disappointed jps rich parents are that they raised a philosophy major and a retarded little brother


both special snowflakes

i bet none of you guys here know what i learned in class yesterday
 
#877163 | Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 16:57:15
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
nobody uses philosophy as a terminal degree, that would be bananas

also, philosopher king master race
 
#877241 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 01:48:08
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

Does this mean

A. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

B. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

C. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

D. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.
 
#877242 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 03:14:10
Norse*
Group: Guest
Posts: 11,85110k
Joined: Feb 2 2009
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,248.50
everybody's gotta love someone
 
#877244 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 06:34:29
Sgull*
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (Norse @ Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 03:14:10)
everybody's gotta love someone


untrue
there are people out there who there is no one for
 
#877250 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 06:58:23
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (Norse @ Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 03:14:10)
everybody's gotta love someone


chris farley voice
 
#877261 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 11:27:03
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 01:48:08)
Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

Does this mean

A. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

B. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

C. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.

D. Nobody loves you and wants to shit in your throat.


Glad to hear that nobody want to shit in my throat. That sounds unpleasant.

Also, I think you might be functionally retarded.
 
#877262 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 12:23:23
beatin
Group: Members
Posts: 2,094
Joined: Oct 25 2009
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 242.45
You should add a poll to this toilet. To do that, you click quit the internet in the lower right. May sound silly, but it adds a visually appealing poll that encourages participation.
 
#877269 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 16:51:58
seth*
Group: Members
Posts: 5,333
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 332.15
BILL poopERS IS AN INNOCENT MAN.
 
#877270 | Mon - Dec 16 2013 - 17:15:11
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (Sgull @ Sat - Dec 14 2013 - 13:56:46)
philosophy is so retarded
who cares


 
#877295 | Tue - Dec 17 2013 - 03:26:57
Norse*
Group: Guest
Posts: 11,85110k
Joined: Feb 2 2009
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,248.50
philosophy isn't THAT bad
 
#877310 | Tue - Dec 17 2013 - 10:15:37
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (Norse @ Tue - Dec 17 2013 - 01:26:57)
philosophy isn't THAT bad


 
#877380 | Wed - Dec 18 2013 - 14:51:09
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
The answer to #1 is both A and B (Someone loves everyone and everyone loves someone)

Proof:

User Image
 
#877381 | Wed - Dec 18 2013 - 14:51:35
nakedsalmon
Group: Guest
Posts: 615
Joined: Mar 18 2013
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 60.00
The answer to #2 is C, only Gary likes nick.

Proof:

User Image

FO-con means that the computer validated first order logical consequence. That proof would be way too time consuming to do manually.

This post has been edited by nakedsalmon on Wed - Dec 18 2013 - 14:58:57
Archived | Views: 2705 | Replies: 25 | General Archive Topic List
 
Quit the Internet
DC Forums powered by ___ and 3rror.org © 2006-2015