Desolate Carnage
Page 3 of 13 - 12 3 45»
 
Nfl 2014-2015
Views: 28616 | Replies: 616 | Started 8 years, 2 months ago
        Top  
#884642 | Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 17:56:53
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
3
        Top  
#884646 | Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 19:31:52
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 17:43:26)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 15:03:43)
Season needs to start already so I can watch my team lose 10 games.


WAIT, YOU GET TO ROOT FOR JOHNNY FOOTBALL ALL YEAR! AWESOME!

browns fan, right?


i thought lance liked the raiders
        Top  
#884648 | Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 19:59:15
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (Sgull @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 17:31:52)
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 17:43:26)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 15:03:43)
Season needs to start already so I can watch my team lose 10 games.


WAIT, YOU GET TO ROOT FOR JOHNNY FOOTBALL ALL YEAR! AWESOME!

browns fan, right?


i thought lance liked the raiders


HE SHOULD ROOT FOR THE BROWNS, AT LEAST HE WOULD HAVE SOMETHING FUN TO LAUGH AT
        Top  
#884656 | Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 01:24:35
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
I find myself silently cheering for the Bengals and follow them. But that might be largely due to the fact I've been to games with my uncle and that type of experience can rub off.

But I started watching football in 2000 and that's back when the Raiders were relevant and everything just fit and thought it was awesome. I wasn't pushed by my family to root for Cincy or Cleveland.

Maybe I'll have something to cheer about in years to come.

We're on the right track though, Al Davis died and recent transactions aren't that bad. But we need to get better at evaluating and developing talent.

This post has been edited by sir_lance_bb on Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 01:25:30
        Top  
#884660 | Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 07:58:07
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 23:24:35)
I find myself silently cheering for the Bengals and follow them. But that might be largely due to the fact I've been to games with my uncle and that type of experience can rub off.

But I started watching football in 2000 and that's back when the Raiders were relevant and everything just fit and thought it was awesome. I wasn't pushed by my family to root for Cincy or Cleveland.

Maybe I'll have something to cheer about in years to come.

We're on the right track though, Al Davis died and recent transactions aren't that bad. But we need to get better at evaluating and developing talent.


biggest hurdle. next is to stop spending stupid money on old players over long contracts
        Top  
#884667 | Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 19:21:32
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (blind_chief @ Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 07:58:07)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Thu - Jun 12 2014 - 23:24:35)
I find myself silently cheering for the Bengals and follow them. But that might be largely due to the fact I've been to games with my uncle and that type of experience can rub off.

But I started watching football in 2000 and that's back when the Raiders were relevant and everything just fit and thought it was awesome. I wasn't pushed by my family to root for Cincy or Cleveland.

Maybe I'll have something to cheer about in years to come.

We're on the right track though, Al Davis died and recent transactions aren't that bad. But we need to get better at evaluating and developing talent.


biggest hurdle. next is to stop spending stupid money on old players over long contracts


None of the signings recently were long. Many of them have options to opt out after 1-2 years.

And it's kind of hard to convince people to come play for Oakland.

If we actually drafted well and developed talent well, wouldn't be that bad.

All good teams key players mostly come from the draft. Most teams don't become good by free agency unless you are the Broncos and sign Peyton or you are the Saints and get lucky and magically have Brees fall in your lap.

I'll agree that our off season wasn't ideal but given the circumstances I'll accept it. And I liked our draft. I'm not entirely convince on the Schaub plan but Carr could work out. Who fucking knows, but bottom line is we need to stop drafting dumpsters and then develop them and then maybe find a way to keep them when their contracts run out so we don't have another veldheer situation.

This post has been edited by sir_lance_bb on Fri - Jun 13 2014 - 19:23:39
        Top  
#885377 | Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
        Top  
#885382 | Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 08:26:39
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year
        Top  
#885384 | Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr
        Top  
#885388 | Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:44:51
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically
        Top  
#885396 | Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.
        Top  
#885403 | Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 19:43:11
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


cutler blows
so does his extra 5 chins

and his pancreas
        Top  
#885424 | Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 09:06:57
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


one ring can be a fluke if your team's defense is incredible. two rings is not possible if your QB isn't great
        Top  
#885428 | Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 14:34:37
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 07:06:57)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


one ring can be a fluke if your team's defense is incredible. two rings is not possible if your QB isn't great


rapes isnt great. hes a game manager who had spectacular teams. drew brees is great (for comparisons)
now stop being a pitt fan boy
        Top  
#885440 | Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 20:03:36
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
As if Clearly being resigned wasn't known ahead of time, but damn it is depressing.

User Image
        Top  
#885448 | Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:02:26
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 14:34:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 07:06:57)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


one ring can be a fluke if your team's defense is incredible. two rings is not possible if your QB isn't great


rapes isnt great. hes a game manager who had spectacular teams. drew brees is great (for comparisons)
now stop being a pitt fan boy


even if he isn't great, he is better than cutler
        Top  
#885449 | Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:03:24
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 06:02:26)
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 14:34:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 07:06:57)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


one ring can be a fluke if your team's defense is incredible. two rings is not possible if your QB isn't great


rapes isnt great. hes a game manager who had spectacular teams. drew brees is great (for comparisons)
now stop being a pitt fan boy


even if he isn't great, he is better than cutler


maybe he was 5 years ago, as of today thats a huge nope
        Top  
#885450 | Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:11:09
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blind_chief @ Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:03:24)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 06:02:26)
Quote (blind_chief @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 14:34:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Thu - Jul 10 2014 - 07:06:57)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 17:40:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 07:44:51)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 09:15:37)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 9 2014 - 06:26:39)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 8 2014 - 20:32:00)


i wonder if its because of his receivers? i would have brees/brady/manning/rodgers/luck/stafford/roethlisburger above him, normally id have ryan/eli higher but they both had shit seasons last year


lol okay
tl;dr


roethlis has 2 superbowls and continues to play well. stafford makes huge game mistakes but so does cutler and stafford is better statistically


saying cutler is because of his receivers and then saying stafford is overall better is laughable. rapesburger does have rings. so does trent dilfer and jeff hostetler. hell, sexy rex was actually close to a ring too.


one ring can be a fluke if your team's defense is incredible. two rings is not possible if your QB isn't great


rapes isnt great. hes a game manager who had spectacular teams. drew brees is great (for comparisons)
now stop being a pitt fan boy


even if he isn't great, he is better than cutler


maybe he was 5 years ago, as of today thats a huge nope


still got the arm and escapability factor that is so rare in quarterbacks. rapes has got that "eyes in the back of his head" awareness to avoid the sack and bounce out of the pocket to make something happen

i don't know why but I've always loved watching him play. i hate him so bad when the pack plays the steelers but i love his football ability.

cutler has nothing about him that makes him fun to watch other than twice a year when we get to see him crying on the sidelines

This post has been edited by blackjack21 on Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:12:27
        Top  
#885451 | Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:17:54
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
btw i love referring him as rapes now. haha
        Top  
#885452 | Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 08:59:52
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Fri - Jul 11 2014 - 06:17:54)
btw i love referring him as rapes now. haha


:D
        Top  
#885588 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 11:52:18
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
jaworski thinks cutler is the 19th best qb in the league

even espn overrates him
        Top  
#885590 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:33
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (Sgull @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 09:52:18)
jaworski thinks cutler is the 19th best qb in the league

even espn overrates him


jaws is awesome at rating qbs
honest
        Top  
#885591 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:56
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
watch, he will put rapes in at like 7, and stafford at like 9
2 bit hack
        Top  
#885592 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:42:00
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:56)
watch, he will put rapes in at like 7, and stafford at like 9
2 bit hack


haha
tbh i thought cutler would be in the top 10 at least, like 7th
jaws will probably say his receivers make him good, which is probably true. not like a rodgers who makes receivers good, then they leave and go other places (greg jennings -> minn) and they blow ass
        Top  
#885601 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 16:35:18
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (Sgull @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:42:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:56)
watch, he will put rapes in at like 7, and stafford at like 9
2 bit hack


haha
tbh i thought cutler would be in the top 10 at least, like 7th
jaws will probably say his receivers make him good, which is probably true. not like a rodgers who makes receivers good, then they leave and go other places (greg jennings -> minn) and they blow ass


i wonder if jennings was only good because of favre/rodgers. i wonder how many years he would have lasted in the league with cutler as his QB
        Top  
#885603 | Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 18:08:03
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 14:35:18)
Quote (Sgull @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:42:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:56)
watch, he will put rapes in at like 7, and stafford at like 9
2 bit hack


haha
tbh i thought cutler would be in the top 10 at least, like 7th
jaws will probably say his receivers make him good, which is probably true. not like a rodgers who makes receivers good, then they leave and go other places (greg jennings -> minn) and they blow ass


i wonder if jennings was only good because of favre/rodgers. i wonder how many years he would have lasted in the league with cutler as his QB


wasnt jennings like 42 when he left gb?
        Top  
#885614 | Thu - Jul 17 2014 - 08:05:18
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 18:08:03)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 14:35:18)
Quote (Sgull @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:42:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 16 2014 - 12:35:56)
watch, he will put rapes in at like 7, and stafford at like 9
2 bit hack


haha
tbh i thought cutler would be in the top 10 at least, like 7th
jaws will probably say his receivers make him good, which is probably true. not like a rodgers who makes receivers good, then they leave and go other places (greg jennings -> minn) and they blow ass


i wonder if jennings was only good because of favre/rodgers. i wonder how many years he would have lasted in the league with cutler as his QB


wasnt jennings like 42 when he left gb?


he was like 28 or 29 p sure
        Top  
#885838 | Wed - Jul 23 2014 - 23:53:18
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Did jaws put Carson Palmer over Cutler? How about casell? Yea :k:
        Top  
#885846 | Thu - Jul 24 2014 - 06:43:28
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Jul 23 2014 - 23:53:18)
Did jaws put Carson Palmer over Cutler?  How about casell?  Yea :k:


this is
myyyyyyyyy wish
        Top  
#885899 | Sat - Jul 26 2014 - 10:54:06
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
jordy nelson 4 years 39 mil, overpaid. I thought they could have gotten him for less money, but i'm not TT or employed by the NFL or an NFL team. hopefully they can extend cobb for 5 mil average or so and it will balance out
        Top  
#886095 | Thu - Aug 7 2014 - 17:26:49
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
pretty sure I'm going to get this:
https://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/nflws/

their site says my address is available for it. $200 for the year but i can watch all the NFL games if i want to and just hook up my laptop to the TV
        Top  
#886102 | Thu - Aug 7 2014 - 20:16:33
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
probably wont get that
might get the nhl package
        Top  
#886119 | Fri - Aug 8 2014 - 09:40:34
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (Sgull @ Thu - Aug 7 2014 - 20:16:33)
probably wont get that
might get the nhl package


you get all the green bay games on local tv. i will get 4 all year if i don't get this
        Top  
#886123 | Fri - Aug 8 2014 - 11:25:56
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
preseason betting??
joe??
        Top  
#886130 | Fri - Aug 8 2014 - 21:38:04
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
matt barkley #1
        Top  
#886136 | Sat - Aug 9 2014 - 01:39:14
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
        Top  
#886137 | Sat - Aug 9 2014 - 07:58:56
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Fri - Aug 8 2014 - 23:39:14)


this is horrible
        Top  
#886147 | Sat - Aug 9 2014 - 21:32:23
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
julius peppierge
        Top  
#886225 | Thu - Aug 14 2014 - 22:11:39
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
bears
        Top  
#886235 | Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 08:22:36
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99120k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.52
fantasy league upd8?
        Top  
#886245 | Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 14:01:06
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (___ @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 09:22:36)
fantasy league upd8?


pliz do
        Top  
#886304 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 18:50:38
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
Quote (randomtask @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 15:01:06)
Quote (___ @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 09:22:36)
fantasy league upd8?


pliz do


ill set up a league tomorrow night, donno how many people will want to play
draft sunday the 31st ok??
        Top  
#886306 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 21:47:01
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (randomtask @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 18:50:38)
Quote (randomtask @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 15:01:06)
Quote (___ @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 09:22:36)
fantasy league upd8?


pliz do


ill set up a league tomorrow night, donno how many people will want to play
draft sunday the 31st ok??

sure :) id love to play. yahoo or espn?
        Top  
#886307 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 21:57:37
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
espn pushing jonny football all day er day
        Top  
#886308 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:00:55
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 19:57:37)
espn pushing jonny football all day er day


IF YOU SAY "QB CONTROVERSY" ENOUGH TIMES LATER YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THE CONTROVERSY THAT EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT!
        Top  
#886309 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:01:03
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 19:47:01)
Quote (randomtask @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 18:50:38)
Quote (randomtask @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 15:01:06)
Quote (___ @ Fri - Aug 15 2014 - 09:22:36)
fantasy league upd8?


pliz do


ill set up a league tomorrow night, donno how many people will want to play
draft sunday the 31st ok??

sure :) id love to play. yahoo or espn?


same
        Top  
#886310 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:49:08
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
i would join only if joes team autodrafts only bears
        Top  
#886311 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:57:14
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (Sgull @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:49:08)
i would join only if joes team autodrafts only bears


first round = forte
second = marshall
third = jeffery
fourth = cutler
fifth = bennet
sixth = bears D
seventh = gould

i don't think any other players would be fantasy relevant.

packers:
first round = lacy
second = rodgers
third = nelson
fourth = cobb
fifth = boykin?
sixth = pack D
seventh = crosby

its funny how close these teams are in fantasy (two top ten receivers, and a top 5 RB each)
        Top  
#886312 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 23:00:55
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:57:14)
Quote (Sgull @ Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 22:49:08)
i would join only if joes team autodrafts only bears


first round = forte
second = marshall
third = jeffery
fourth = cutler
fifth = bennet
sixth = bears D
seventh = gould

i don't think any other players would be fantasy relevant.

packers:
first round = lacy
second = rodgers
third = nelson
fourth = cobb
fifth = boykin?
sixth = pack D
seventh = crosby

its funny how close these teams are in fantasy (two top ten receivers, and a top 5 RB each)


yeah except cuntler is like a late 10th round pick
rodgers goes #1-5
        Top  
#886313 | Mon - Aug 18 2014 - 23:03:14
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19740k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.70 $ $
one day you will have a fucking trash qb and you will think back to me, and the 20 years i spent to move up to cutler, and in your mind you will hear :joe: laughing
Views: 28616 | Replies: 616 | Sports Topic List
Page 3 of 13 - 12 3 45»
 
Quit the Internet