Quote (ppkpkppk @ Dec 9 2007 - 13:52:58)
Quote (7_Deadly_Sins @ Dec 9 2007 - 13:45:58)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Dec 9 2007 - 13:43:36)
I also love how he made a "Schlag96 clause" in the rule.
.....
So, because he sold his RL items, and betted, you expect him not to be able to use his [unit not allowed]?
That's stupid. If he sold his RL items for [unit not allowed], the [unit not allowed] did not come from betting, it came from the forum that he wants to use it in.
I agree with his statement on that 100%
I can't logically argue against this.
But thats because I can't logically argue against a clause that said "If you got [unit not allowed] from selling Diablo ii items, you can buy rl items with that [unit not allowed]."
Btw, 7_deadly, how do you feel about the annis rule?
Your first statement makes no point.
And, I think the new rule makes it fair. Sure, it stops me from bidding.
Anni hunters are able to make unresonable ammounts of [unit not allowed]. It just makes it fair for everyone.
Edit: How many people do you see that are able to pull in 20k a month just from mfing or botting? Not many unless it's HC and they have 3-4 running, even then I don't think it's possible.
Also, how many people do you see that are able to buy several big items every month? Not many, if they're or could, they're anni hunters.