Desolate Carnage
Page 2 of 3 - 1 2 3
 
Michigan
Views: 6102 | Replies: 112 | Started 15 years, 3 months ago
        Top  
#611846 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:43:20
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
pg2
        Top  
#611849 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:56:13
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


highly doubt this would ever happen
        Top  
#611854 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:08:43
Group: Members
Posts: 26,99320k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,959.57
meeeeeeeeechigan :D
        Top  
#611855 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:13:15
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


I'd rather have Cincy put into the Big 10 rather than Pitt.

But I think this should happen.

Let Cincinnati in and Pitt in and Notre Dame.

Then we be the Big 14.

        Top  
#611856 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:15:55
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
nn cincinnati in the big 10
        Top  
#611860 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:37:44
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
SEC >
        Top  
#611861 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:38:09
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:56:13)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


highly doubt this would ever happen


Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11

Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:15:55)
nn cincinnati in the big 10


That would be horrible


Also please tell me why the big 10 is so much better right now than the big east other than minn and psu beating cuse.

Oh maybe because beating up on navy toledeo and losing your only big ooc games is worth something.
        Top  
#611862 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:40:01
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 12:38:09)
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:56:13)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


highly doubt this would ever happen


Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11

Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:15:55)
nn cincinnati in the big 10


That would be horrible


Also please tell me why the big 10 is so much better right now than the big east other than minn and psu beating cuse.

Oh maybe because beating up on navy toledeo and losing your only big ooc games is worth something.


Rutgers is in your conference.

All your other points are moot.
        Top  
#611864 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:07
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:40:01)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 12:38:09)
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:56:13)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


highly doubt this would ever happen


Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11

Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:15:55)
nn cincinnati in the big 10


That would be horrible


Also please tell me why the big 10 is so much better right now than the big east other than minn and psu beating cuse.

Oh maybe because beating up on navy toledeo and losing your only big ooc games is worth something.


Northwestern is in your conference.

All your other points are moot.


        Top  
#611865 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:12
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:40:01)
Rutgers is in your conference.

All your other points are moot.


        Top  
#611866 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:41
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
look, the big east is horrible and you know it
        Top  
#611868 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:44:44
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:41)
look, the big east is horrible and you know it


What has the big 10 better this year then the big east?
Name an ooc top 25 win, the big east has 2
        Top  
#611869 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:45:05
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:44:44)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:41)
look, the big east is horrible and you know it


What has the big 10 better this year then the big east?
Name an ooc top 25 win, the big east has 2


oh yea nd but come on we all know they suck
        Top  
#611940 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.

This post has been edited by sir_lance_bb on Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:52
        Top  
#611941 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:50:06
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
This post has been edited by sir_lance_bb on Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:52
        Top  
#611943 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
seriously, lol big east
        Top  
#611981 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:55:22
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:42:07)
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:40:01)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 12:38:09)
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 10:56:13)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:43:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 09:30:57)
nd would never make their football program play in the big east.  the big east is horrible, on par with the swac


Theres some talk of moving pitt into the big 10 and giving some other shitty schools to the big east.


highly doubt this would ever happen


Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11

Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 11:15:55)
nn cincinnati in the big 10


That would be horrible


Also please tell me why the big 10 is so much better right now than the big east other than minn and psu beating cuse.

Oh maybe because beating up on navy toledeo and losing your only big ooc games is worth something.


Northwestern is in your conference.

All your other points are moot.


Northwestern started that spread offense shit. Without that every other conference would suck.
        Top  
#612014 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:20:02
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?
        Top  
#612018 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:30:56
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 15:20:02)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?


if you honestly think a constructive argument needs to be made about why the big east is absolutely laughable in football i dont know what to say
as for the childish part, NOU
        Top  
#612037 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:05:32
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:30:56)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 15:20:02)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?


if you honestly think a constructive argument needs to be made about why the big east is absolutely laughable in football i dont know what to say
as for the childish part, NOU


figures
        Top  
#612041 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:13:01
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:20:02)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?


Just saying you can be in 2 different conferences for 2 different sports.
        Top  
#612042 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:14:06
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 16:05:32)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:30:56)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 15:20:02)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?


if you honestly think a constructive argument needs to be made about why the big east is absolutely laughable in football i dont know what to say
as for the childish part, NOU


figures


im flabbergasted in how you can honestly think the big east is anything but a second tier conference
        Top  
#612043 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:15:33
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:14:06)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 16:05:32)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 17:30:56)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 15:20:02)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 14:00:11)
seriously, lol big east


ofc, when you disagree rather then form an argument reply with something childish

Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 13:49:27)
Quote
Same they are a Beast tradition school. Also none of those schools are going to leave for the shitty basketball played in the big 11


villanova is not a big east school in football but for basketball they are.


and?


if you honestly think a constructive argument needs to be made about why the big east is absolutely laughable in football i dont know what to say
as for the childish part, NOU


figures


im flabbergasted in how you can honestly think the big east is anything but a second tier conference


get out of 1995
        Top  
#612044 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?
        Top  
#612045 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:19:25
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38)
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?


the point is you are living way back in the past when the big 11 was good, they no longer are
        Top  
#612047 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:26:24
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 16:19:25)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38)
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?


the point is you are living way back in the past when the big 11 was good, they no longer are


so we are having to different discussions here, you are telling me how bad the big 10 is, while i am telling you how bad the big east is, and you cant see why we cant come to a resolution?
        Top  
#612048 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:29:30
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:19:25)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38)
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?


the point is you are living way back in the past when the big 11 was good, they no longer are


Just cuz they didn't run some gimmick offenses that only work at the college level? And even so they run deeper than any conference other than maybe the SEC, Big-12, and Pac-10. And now that they're using what works at the college level, its not gonna take them that long to reestablish themselves because they are a better conference.

Theres a reason Rich Rod wouldn't hesitate to leave the best team in the Big East for a team that was going to struggle but is in the Big 10.

This post has been edited by ppkpkppk on Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:30:03
        Top  
#612050 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:32:14
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:26:24)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 16:19:25)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38)
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?


the point is you are living way back in the past when the big 11 was good, they no longer are


so we are having to different discussions here, you are telling me how bad the big 10 is, while i am telling you how bad the big east is, and you cant see why we cant come to a resolution?


you are acting as if there is a large gap between the two conferences but there is not. that is what I am saying

Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:29:30)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:19:25)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:18:38)
big quote train is big
what exactly has the big east done since 1995?couple of top 10 finishes?


the point is you are living way back in the past when the big 11 was good, they no longer are


Just cuz they didn't run some gimmick offenses that only work at the college level? And even so they run deeper than any conference other than maybe the SEC, Big-12, and Pac-10. And now that they're using what works at the college level, its not gonna take them that long to reestablish themselves because they are a better conference.

Theres a reason Rich Rod wouldn't hesitate to leave the best team in the Big East for a team that was going to struggle but is in the Big 10.


Excuses and RR is a huge douche
        Top  
#612051 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:33:13
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quit gobbling up what the national media tells you to think and look objectively.
Just because you are used to particular teams being good does not mean they are anymore
        Top  
#612059 | Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:51:56
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
SEC >
        Top  
#612257 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:28:51
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537
        Top  
#612258 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:33:23
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >
        Top  
#612259 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:34:01
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 10:33:23)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >


        Top  
#612260 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:34:28
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:33:23)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >


Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:32:14)


you are acting as if there is a large gap between the two conferences but there is not. that is what I am saying




        Top  
#612263 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:44:01
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:34:28)
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:33:23)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >


Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:32:14)


you are acting as if there is a large gap between the two conferences but there is not. that is what I am saying



I honestly do not think that half or more of the teams in the big east could beat the lower level teams in the B10, like northwestern, minnesota, purdue, mich state, illinois
        Top  
#612264 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:45:16
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:44:01)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:34:28)
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:33:23)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >


Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:32:14)


you are acting as if there is a large gap between the two conferences but there is not. that is what I am saying



I honestly do not think that half or more of the teams in the big east could beat the lower level teams in the B10, like northwestern, minnesota, purdue, mich state, illinois


The cuse, which is at the bottom of the Beast beat NW and took Minn to OT. Try to be less of a homer.

This post has been edited by bubbachunk on Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:45:26
        Top  
#612265 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:47:38
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:45:16)
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:44:01)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:34:28)
Quote (smoked @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:33:23)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:28:51)
Quote (Mark Schlabach(2:25 PM))
Jose, I'm not so sure Ohio State's schedule is so much better than Cincinnati that the Buckeyes would deserve it over an undefeated UC team. They did beat Oregon State and Fresno State during non-conference play, and would have beaten a few good Big East teams. The Big Ten isn't that much better than the Big East this year, either.


http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/28537


Arent you quoting something that proves the big ten is at least somewhat better than the big east even in a down year for the b10? "isnt that much" is still >


Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Sep 28 2009 - 18:32:14)


you are acting as if there is a large gap between the two conferences but there is not. that is what I am saying



I honestly do not think that half or more of the teams in the big east could beat the lower level teams in the B10, like northwestern, minnesota, purdue, mich state, illinois


The cuse, which is at the bottom of the Beast beat NW and took Minn to OT. Try to be less of a homer.


Ohio State can beat every team inside the Big East.

Penn State can do the same.

The only team you have inside your conference that can rival OSU or PSU is Cincinnati and they are good but just have less talent.
        Top  
#612267 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:09
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Can and would are two very different things
        Top  
#612268 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:49
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
fact is the big east will never be on the big 10s level, let alone the other 3 major conferences. the acc is better than the big east also. while you may be "closer" this year that is due to the big 10 being seen as a 1 or 2 team conference. every conference is a 1 or 2 team conference. the big east just happens to be a 0 team conference with no hope of ever being in a title game, let alone competing on the national stage as a conference.
        Top  
#612269 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:07:42
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:49)
fact is the big east will never be on the big 10s level, let alone the other 3 major conferences.  the acc is better than the big east also.  while you may be "closer" this year that is due to the big 10 being seen as a 1 or 2 team conference.  every conference is a 1 or 2 team conference.  the big east just happens to be a 0 team conference with no hope of ever being in a title game, let alone competing on the national stage as a conference.


The big 10 has been seen as that for what seems like years now and their 2nd team just got blasted at home by iowa. Also to call the beast a 0 team conference is idiotic, Uc is ranked #10 and USF just handled FSU on its home turf to move to 4-0.
        Top  
#612271 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:17:44
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 14:07:42)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:49)
fact is the big east will never be on the big 10s level, let alone the other 3 major conferences.  the acc is better than the big east also.  while you may be "closer" this year that is due to the big 10 being seen as a 1 or 2 team conference.  every conference is a 1 or 2 team conference.  the big east just happens to be a 0 team conference with no hope of ever being in a title game, let alone competing on the national stage as a conference.


The big 10 has been seen as that for what seems like years now and their 2nd team just got blasted at home by iowa. Also to call the beast a 0 team conference is idiotic, Uc is ranked #10 and USF just handled FSU on its home turf to move to 4-0.


I cant argue properly now since im doing work :-\
        Top  
#612273 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:23:55
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:07:42)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:49)
fact is the big east will never be on the big 10s level, let alone the other 3 major conferences.  the acc is better than the big east also.  while you may be "closer" this year that is due to the big 10 being seen as a 1 or 2 team conference.  every conference is a 1 or 2 team conference.  the big east just happens to be a 0 team conference with no hope of ever being in a title game, let alone competing on the national stage as a conference.


The big 10 has been seen as that for what seems like years now and their 2nd team just got blasted at home by iowa. Also to call the beast a 0 team conference is idiotic, Uc is ranked #10 and USF just handled FSU on its home turf to move to 4-0.


every school has a counter for whatever reason. iowa has psu's number for years now.
the pac 10 is a one school conference on the national stage, though other schools crop up occasionally. big 12 has 2-3 schools who are on the national stage (with which team it is varying from year to year), though they cant play defense at all so they go nowhere. big 10 has 3 schools who traditionally show up on the national stage, though michigan had a down year last year (was only 2 years ago they were #1/2 with osu going into the final game of the year and by rights everyone knew they were still the best 2 teams in the nation. sec gets the most fanfare recently so they apparently have the most teams on the national stage come bowl time. the acc has zero teams on the national stage. the big east has zero teams on the national stage. and when they do get a team that can make it to bowl time with 0-1 losses its always a different team than 5 years ago when they last had a good team.
ohh, and the acc is laughable, beating fsu is nothing to be excited about outside of its another W.
        Top  
#612274 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:24:25
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
/wall of text didnt meant to write so much but nn revamping that into something shorter whenst at work
        Top  
#612280 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:40:27
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:23:55)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:07:42)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 12:57:49)
fact is the big east will never be on the big 10s level, let alone the other 3 major conferences.  the acc is better than the big east also.  while you may be "closer" this year that is due to the big 10 being seen as a 1 or 2 team conference.  every conference is a 1 or 2 team conference.  the big east just happens to be a 0 team conference with no hope of ever being in a title game, let alone competing on the national stage as a conference.


The big 10 has been seen as that for what seems like years now and their 2nd team just got blasted at home by iowa. Also to call the beast a 0 team conference is idiotic, Uc is ranked #10 and USF just handled FSU on its home turf to move to 4-0.


every school has a counter for whatever reason. iowa has psu's number for years now.
the pac 10 is a one school conference on the national stage, though other schools crop up occasionally. big 12 has 2-3 schools who are on the national stage (with which team it is varying from year to year), though they cant play defense at all so they go nowhere. big 10 has 3 schools who traditionally show up on the national stage, though michigan had a down year last year (was only 2 years ago they were #1/2 with osu going into the final game of the year and by rights everyone knew they were still the best 2 teams in the nation. sec gets the most fanfare recently so they apparently have the most teams on the national stage come bowl time. the acc has zero teams on the national stage. the big east has zero teams on the national stage. and when they do get a team that can make it to bowl time with 0-1 losses its always a different team than 5 years ago when they last had a good team.
ohh, and the acc is laughable, beating fsu is nothing to be excited about outside of its another W.


I think Va Tech and Miami (albeit controversy fucked them) can be seen on the national stage.
        Top  
#612281 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:41:56
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
I can't wait until FSU & "Da U" return to power (one day maybe). I just wish there was more National Contender instead of 1-2 teams.
        Top  
#612282 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:48:02
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (MoS. @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:41:56)
I can't wait until FSU & "Da U" return to power (one day maybe).  I just wish there was more National Contender instead of 1-2 teams.


agreed
agree with tek too, but what really sets things in motion is when a program is good for a few years in a row, not a random year, then fade back into nothing. also, rankings after week 3 are lol.
        Top  
#612283 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:55:10
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:48:02)
Quote (MoS. @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:41:56)
I can't wait until FSU & "Da U" return to power (one day maybe).  I just wish there was more National Contender instead of 1-2 teams.


agreed
agree with tek too, but what really sets things in motion is when a program is good for a few years in a row, not a random year, then fade back into nothing. also, rankings after week 3 are lol.


Week 4 and while they may be the greatly influence the bcs bowl games like it or not.
        Top  
#612297 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 14:59:14
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:55:10)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 13:48:02)
Quote (MoS. @ Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 11:41:56)
I can't wait until FSU & "Da U" return to power (one day maybe).  I just wish there was more National Contender instead of 1-2 teams.


agreed
agree with tek too, but what really sets things in motion is when a program is good for a few years in a row, not a random year, then fade back into nothing. also, rankings after week 3 are lol.


Week 4 and while they may be the greatly influence the bcs bowl games like it or not.


huh?
im saying any ranking prior to the midway mark is lol
        Top  
#612311 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 15:28:08
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
SEC >
        Top  
#612312 | Tue - Sep 29 2009 - 15:28:44
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
99
Views: 6102 | Replies: 112 | Sports Topic List
Page 2 of 3 - 1 2 3
 
Quit the Internet