DesolateCarnage.net
Members | Search
Desolate Carnage
Hey Guest
Options Menu
DC Forums → Sports → It Has Finally Happened!
 
It Has Finally Happened!, 44 years of opression comes to an end!
Views: 2625 | Replies: 20 | Started 14 years, 11 months ago
        Top  
#664669 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:33:57
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
User Image

WHO YA GOT
        Top  
#664670 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:35:05
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
WHO DAT SAY THEY GON BEAT DEM SAINTS WHO DAT WHO DAT
        Top  
#664671 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:37:34
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
P.S. Darelle Revis now has aids.
Also, the saints have successfully retired two quarterbacks this season, just as alabama made two cry. Can they keep up the streak and retire Peyton as well? (If they just make him cry, that will suffice as well) I think I'll speak for the general populous and say God I hope so.

This post has been edited by Daniel on Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:39:48
        Top  
#664677 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:51:10
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
why a pic where it looks like they are gonna kiss
        Top  
#664678 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:53:11
randomtask*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
why the donald trump hair
        Top  
#664690 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 17:10:26
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:51:10)
why a pic where it looks like they are gonna kiss


Peyton is initiating, Brees is looking at him funny.
        Top  
#664691 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 17:10:48
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 17:10:26)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 16:51:10)
why a pic where it looks like they are gonna kiss


Peyton is initiating, Brees is looking at him funny.


And about to grab his balls.
        Top  
#664731 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 19:31:41
RewtheBrave
Group: Guest
Posts: 1,945
Joined: Sep 20 2009
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,290.50
It would be nice if both of these teams could lose the Superbowl.
        Top  
#664750 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.
        Top  
#664764 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.
        Top  
#664766 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:18:25
smoked*
Group: Members
Posts: 47,60340k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44,538.17
I thought this thread would be amusing or worth opening.

I was wrong on both accounts.
        Top  
#664767 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:19:24
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Quote (smoked @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:18:25)
I thought this thread would be amusing or worth opening.

I was wrong on both accounts.


Steelolers
        Top  
#664893 | Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.

        Top  
#664930 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.
        Top  
#664949 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:13:52
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.


The ball was clearly uncatchable, and I don't remember seeing any contact. That also still leaves the two erroneous spots given to the Saints, and the fact they were awarded a catch that was anything but, all on the same drive.
        Top  
#664954 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:16:06
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:13:52)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.


The ball was clearly uncatchable, and I don't remember seeing any contact. That also still leaves the two erroneous spots given to the Saints, and the fact they were awarded a catch that was anything but, all on the same drive.


I'll admit there was controversial calls but the Vikings can't expect to win turning the ball over 5 or more times.

Either way I don't give a shit, Saints will win the Super Bowl.
        Top  
#664956 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:17:32
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:16:06)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:13:52)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.


The ball was clearly uncatchable, and I don't remember seeing any contact. That also still leaves the two erroneous spots given to the Saints, and the fact they were awarded a catch that was anything but, all on the same drive.


I'll admit there was controversial calls but the Vikings can't expect to win turning the ball over 5 or more times.

Either way I don't give a shit, Saints will win the Super Bowl.



I agree, if they don't turn the ball over 5 times the game is a rout, and it doesn't come down to horrible officiating.

Unfortunately it did, and to have all of those happen on the same drive mars what could have wound up being an epic finish to the game.
        Top  
#664960 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:19:30
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:17:32)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:16:06)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:13:52)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.


The ball was clearly uncatchable, and I don't remember seeing any contact. That also still leaves the two erroneous spots given to the Saints, and the fact they were awarded a catch that was anything but, all on the same drive.


I'll admit there was controversial calls but the Vikings can't expect to win turning the ball over 5 or more times.

Either way I don't give a shit, Saints will win the Super Bowl.



I agree, if they don't turn the ball over 5 times the game is a rout, and it doesn't come down to horrible officiating.

Unfortunately it did, and to have all of those happen on the same drive mars what could have wound up being an epic finish to the game.


I am just glad I didn't have to witness anymore farve bullshit.

This post has been edited by sir_lance_bb on Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:19:54
        Top  
#665011 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:57:12
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:19:30)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:17:32)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:16:06)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 08:13:52)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 01:28:56)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


The reason pass interference was called because the defensive player never turned his head towards the ball. The refs almost call that pass interference every time. The only valid argument is whether or not that ball was catchable.


The ball was clearly uncatchable, and I don't remember seeing any contact. That also still leaves the two erroneous spots given to the Saints, and the fact they were awarded a catch that was anything but, all on the same drive.


I'll admit there was controversial calls but the Vikings can't expect to win turning the ball over 5 or more times.

Either way I don't give a shit, Saints will win the Super Bowl.



I agree, if they don't turn the ball over 5 times the game is a rout, and it doesn't come down to horrible officiating.

Unfortunately it did, and to have all of those happen on the same drive mars what could have wound up being an epic finish to the game.


I am just glad I didn't have to witness anymore farve bullshit.


I used to be more of a basher. Came to admire him this year for the most part. I do hope he can cut out the drama this off-season, but I suppose that's asking for far too much.
        Top  
#665012 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 09:01:20
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 23:59:20)
Quote (Daniel @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 21:16:04)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jan 25 2010 - 20:25:20)
I'm taking the Vikings, since they're the team from the NFC that should be there.


But they're not.


Actually, they are. The Saints didn't get the 1st down, there was no pass interference on that pass interference call, and the last "catch" wasn't a catch.


No..
No...
        Top  
#665014 | Tue - Jan 26 2010 - 09:06:04
Daniel
Group: Guest
Posts: 5,518
Joined: Nov 19 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6.45
Thats kindof low on the list.. a sore loser thats not even a fan.
Views: 2625 | Replies: 20 | Sports Topic List
 
Quit the Internet
DC Forums powered by ___ and 3rror.org © 2006-2015