DesolateCarnage.net
Members | Search
Desolate Carnage
Hey Guest
Options Menu
DC Forums → Sports → Home Run Derby
 
Home Run Derby
Views: 2494 | Replies: 32 | Started 14 years, 5 months ago
        Top  
#730303 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 08:17:09
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
the lineup sucks this year. swisher? ortiz? srsly? holliday is probably the best name and he isnt even that rediculous
        Top  
#730313 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54
bubbachunk*
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing
        Top  
#730317 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:50:16
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


ill believe this...
        Top  
#730366 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terrible.
        Top  
#730372 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:24:33
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


        Top  
#730424 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59
ppkpkppk*
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.
        Top  
#730477 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.

        Top  
#730523 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:45:18
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.


If you're going to argue against someone's claim, argue back with empirical evidence. You can't win an argument by saying "oh yeah your wrong because you didn't back up with stats, and neither did I but I don't need too".

That makes sense.

You're stupid. This is stupid.
        Top  
#730569 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:47:26
bubbachunk*
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:45:18)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.


If you're going to argue against someone's claim, argue back with empirical evidence. You can't win an argument by saying "oh yeah your wrong because you didn't back up with stats, and neither did I but I don't need too".

That makes sense.

You're stupid. This is stupid.


LOL RAPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Your best post lance
        Top  
#730571 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:48:53
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:47:26)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:45:18)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.


If you're going to argue against someone's claim, argue back with empirical evidence. You can't win an argument by saying "oh yeah your wrong because you didn't back up with stats, and neither did I but I don't need too".

That makes sense.

You're stupid. This is stupid.


LOL RAPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Your best post lance


lance is now ahead of nick, nick has re-earned the biggest DC retard award
        Top  
#730711 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 15:52:18
Sgull*
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:48:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:47:26)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:45:18)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.


If you're going to argue against someone's claim, argue back with empirical evidence. You can't win an argument by saying "oh yeah your wrong because you didn't back up with stats, and neither did I but I don't need too".

That makes sense.

You're stupid. This is stupid.


LOL RAPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Your best post lance


lance is now ahead of nick, nick has re-earned the biggest DC retard award


nick has always been that
        Top  
#730712 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 15:55:49
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (Sgull @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 15:52:18)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:48:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:47:26)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:45:18)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:16:32)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:01:59)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 13:24:33)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 12:04:53)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 09:45:54)
the big names turn it down cause it fucks with your swing


Terrible excuse is terribad.


Well considering that past home run derby winners have been fucked post-HR derby, I'd say argument has some merit.


As per all things posted on DC.net

If you're going to make claims, validate your claims with empirical evidence.


If you're going to argue against someone's claim, argue back with empirical evidence. You can't win an argument by saying "oh yeah your wrong because you didn't back up with stats, and neither did I but I don't need too".

That makes sense.

You're stupid. This is stupid.


LOL RAPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Your best post lance


lance is now ahead of nick, nick has re-earned the biggest DC retard award


nick has always been that


prolly
        Top  
#730714 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.
        Top  
#730715 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science
        Top  
#730716 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect
        Top  
#730717 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:59
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect


things are proven correct, so we can infer when something is incorrect
        Top  
#730718 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:11:16
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:59)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect


things are proven correct, so we can infer when something is incorrect


pretty fucking dumb for a bunch of science majors and a handicapped kid
        Top  
#730725 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
they once had to prove that the world was not flat. this proves you wrong. i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.
        Top  
#730729 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:24:55
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41)
they once had to prove that the world was not flat.  this proves you wrong.  i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.


the belief was the world was flat

the world was round

they proved that the world was round by sailing around it, you don't prove things false
        Top  
#730730 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:29:28
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:24:55)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41)
they once had to prove that the world was not flat.  this proves you wrong.  i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.


the belief was the world was flat

the world was round

they proved that the world was round by sailing around it, you don't prove things false


People theorized mainly greeks thousands of years ago that the universe was geocentric, and years later we proved that this was false.

Go make yourself feel better knowing a handicapped kid has more intelligence than you.
        Top  
#730731 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:30:06
MoS.
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:29:28)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:24:55)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41)
they once had to prove that the world was not flat.  this proves you wrong.  i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.


the belief was the world was flat

the world was round

they proved that the world was round by sailing around it, you don't prove things false


People theorized mainly greeks thousands of years ago that the universe was geocentric, and years later we proved that this was false.

Go make yourself feel better knowing a handicapped kid has more intelligence than you.


They believed the world was flat, what the fuck is wrong with you.
        Top  
#730732 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:39:55
sir_lance_bb*
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:30:06)
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:29:28)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:24:55)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41)
they once had to prove that the world was not flat.  this proves you wrong.  i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.


the belief was the world was flat

the world was round

they proved that the world was round by sailing around it, you don't prove things false


People theorized mainly greeks thousands of years ago that the universe was geocentric, and years later we proved that this was false.

Go make yourself feel better knowing a handicapped kid has more intelligence than you.


They believed the world was flat, what the fuck is wrong with you.


Poor mox is freaking out.
        Top  
#730733 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:45:32
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:24:55)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:23:41)
they once had to prove that the world was not flat.  this proves you wrong.  i have now twice proven things incorrect and didnt prove anything correct.


the belief was the world was flat

the world was round

they proved that the world was round by sailing around it, you don't prove things false


i would postulate that often times you would find data that does not support a view so you are left disproving something, and you may potentially prove something with further research. you are in fact wrong.

This post has been edited by blind_chief on Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:51:26
        Top  
#730737 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:51:39
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
This post has been edited by blind_chief on Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 14:51:26
        Top  
#730738 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:53:54
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
karl popper said, and i quote:

Quote (Karl Popper)
Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.


so you see that even when trying to prove something you are actually trying to disprove it.
        Top  
#730749 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 18:08:40
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:11:16)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:59)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect


things are proven correct, so we can infer when something is incorrect


pretty fucking dumb for a bunch of science majors and a handicapped kid


you trying to say you know anything about science is just so fucking lol
        Top  
#730752 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 19:33:04
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
cory hart for pres

big pappi is gonna win though
        Top  
#730766 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 20:07:21
sardoniclysane*
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
It's the home run derby.

It just flat out sucks.
        Top  
#730775 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 20:40:31
BBQ*
Group: Members
Posts: 7,812
Joined: Feb 24 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,703.25
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 20:07:21)
It's the home run derby.

It just flat out sucks.


well put
        Top  
#730789 | Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 22:03:35
blind_chief*
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
big pappi
        Top  
#730885 | Tue - Jul 13 2010 - 07:39:13
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 18:08:40)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:11:16)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:59)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect


things are proven correct, so we can infer when something is incorrect


pretty fucking dumb for a bunch of science majors and a handicapped kid


you trying to say you know anything about science is just so fucking lol


        Top  
#733123 | Fri - Jul 16 2010 - 08:01:01
blackjack21*
Group: Members
Posts: 13,90610k
Joined: Apr 28 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,331.84
i know that the derby is sposed to jinx you and fuck up your swing so u cant hit homers anymore, but corey hart hit 13 homers in the derby, and then just hit one yesterday vs atlanta.

maybe he didnt get phased?
        Top  
#733228 | Fri - Jul 16 2010 - 16:01:14
Sgull*
Group: Members
Posts: 60,63040k
Joined: Aug 30 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 75,457.20
Quote (blackjack21 @ Tue - Jul 13 2010 - 07:39:13)
Quote (blackjack21 @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 18:08:40)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:11:16)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:59)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:38)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:10:23)
Quote (MoS. @ Mon - Jul 12 2010 - 16:09:21)
The claim is that the home run derby contributes to lowered home run output by Tek.

I don't have to provide evidence of the contrary to prove that correct.


i.e. l2science


things are proven correct, not proven incorrect


things are proven correct, so we can infer when something is incorrect


pretty fucking dumb for a bunch of science majors and a handicapped kid


you trying to say you know anything about science is just so fucking lol


Views: 2494 | Replies: 32 | Sports Topic List
 
Quit the Internet
DC Forums powered by ___ and 3rror.org © 2006-2015