Desolate Carnage
Page 2 of 2 - 1 2
 
@ Joe
Views: 5292 | Replies: 80 | Started 14 years, 5 months ago
        Top  
#734593 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 11:49:58
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
2
        Top  
#734594 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 11:50:11
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 08:52:32)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 23:41:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:58:43)
all you are saying is 3 guys = the cubs are old.  its ridiculous.  and lol more fancy stats that are a creation of some dude over the last 10 years.  they sound cool but mean next to nothing.

if you cant admit what ramirez and lee mean to the cubs, and how each of them hitting about 200 is not a slump then :donno:.  if, in 5 years, neither has ever recovered, then we can claim age and their career is over.  but until then im gonna go with slump.  im sure you will refute this.


How is that a fucking fancy stat or are you just trolling?


Fancy stat = sabermetric
Babip = sabermetric


this
        Top  
#734613 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 12:32:04
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 11:50:11)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 08:52:32)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 23:41:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:58:43)
all you are saying is 3 guys = the cubs are old.  its ridiculous.  and lol more fancy stats that are a creation of some dude over the last 10 years.  they sound cool but mean next to nothing.

if you cant admit what ramirez and lee mean to the cubs, and how each of them hitting about 200 is not a slump then :donno:.  if, in 5 years, neither has ever recovered, then we can claim age and their career is over.  but until then im gonna go with slump.  im sure you will refute this.


How is that a fucking fancy stat or are you just trolling?


Fancy stat = sabermetric
Babip = sabermetric


this


Cincinnati young talent > lolcubs

Go sit in a corner.
        Top  
#734617 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 12:37:21
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
im not sure how i could rebuke your well thought out position that "Cincinnati young talent > lolcubs"
        Top  
#734653 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 18:26:50
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 11:50:11)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 08:52:32)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 23:41:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:58:43)
all you are saying is 3 guys = the cubs are old.  its ridiculous.  and lol more fancy stats that are a creation of some dude over the last 10 years.  they sound cool but mean next to nothing.

if you cant admit what ramirez and lee mean to the cubs, and how each of them hitting about 200 is not a slump then :donno:.  if, in 5 years, neither has ever recovered, then we can claim age and their career is over.  but until then im gonna go with slump.  im sure you will refute this.


How is that a fucking fancy stat or are you just trolling?


Fancy stat = sabermetric
Babip = sabermetric


this


facepalm.jpg

stay old and dont adapt, it will always work for you
        Top  
#734662 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 19:34:07
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 12:37:21)
im not sure how i could rebuke your well thought out position that "Cincinnati young talent > lolcubs"


I just love making any post that includes lolcubs. Hating on the cubs is the only accepted bullying that exists. Can't miss out on it.
        Top  
#734665 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:12:19
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 16:26:50)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 11:50:11)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 08:52:32)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 23:41:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:58:43)
all you are saying is 3 guys = the cubs are old.  its ridiculous.  and lol more fancy stats that are a creation of some dude over the last 10 years.  they sound cool but mean next to nothing.

if you cant admit what ramirez and lee mean to the cubs, and how each of them hitting about 200 is not a slump then :donno:.  if, in 5 years, neither has ever recovered, then we can claim age and their career is over.  but until then im gonna go with slump.  im sure you will refute this.


How is that a fucking fancy stat or are you just trolling?


Fancy stat = sabermetric
Babip = sabermetric


this


facepalm.jpg

stay old and dont adapt, it will always work for you


be hip and try to use any obscure stat in the hops it helps your argument even though it has no bearing
not to mention the stat you used is primarily used to track aberrations, so it does not even apply
        Top  
#734666 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:26:45
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
It is not obscure, it essentially quantifies luck and could explain why a particular player is not putting up the numbers they are used to. As long as the player has a consistent line drive percentage he will have a BABIP of around 300, which means that 3 of every time the player hits the ball it goes for a hit. Sometimes a player will just end up hitting balls right at guys consistently and not finding holes so therefore their BABIP would be lower than league average but 99% of the time it will normalize over the course of the season. Some guys like Ichiro have a higher BABIP dude to his excellent speed getting infield hits.

tl;dr

it is a useful stat which explains the old adage of "luck" or "finding holes" to which without it you make a baseless argument about luck
        Top  
#734669 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:57:09
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 18:26:45)
It is not obscure, it essentially quantifies luck and could explain why a particular player is not putting up the numbers they are used to. As long as the player has a consistent line drive percentage he will have a BABIP of around 300, which means that 3 of every time the player hits the ball it goes for a hit. Sometimes a player will just end up hitting balls right at guys consistently and not finding holes so therefore their BABIP would be lower than league average but 99% of the time it will normalize over the course of the season. Some guys like Ichiro have a higher BABIP dude to his excellent speed getting infield hits.

tl;dr

it is a useful stat which explains the old adage of "luck" or "finding holes" to which without it you make a baseless argument about luck


the stat removes homeruns but adds in sac flys. makes no sense in calculating a players "luck" as you call it (which is a load of garbage).
still does not change the fact its just finding another new age stat that tells you when a person is behaving abnormally. unless they are ofc abnormal in talent (or lack there of). which is what i said.

and you were the one who brought it out talking about luck (i guess thats what you were alluding to). all i said was lee and rameriz were in early season slumps and you said they were old.
        Top  
#734670 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:58:23
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
i can find anything i want in stats given enough obscure stats that no one ever needed in gauging players before the last 25 years (aka the computer generation). still does not make every stat valid.

these stats can be good tools, but they are not some end all be all indicator you keep trying to make them out to be. in fact they are more obscure than the time tested stats weve been reading on the back of cards since we could read.

This post has been edited by blind_chief on Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:06:18
        Top  
#734673 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:12:32
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:58:23)
i can find anything i want in stats given enough obscure stats that no one ever needed in gauging players before the last 25 years (aka the computer generation).  still does not make every stat valid.

these stats can be good tools, but they are not some end all be all indicator you keep trying to make them out to be.  in fact they are more obscure than the time tested stats weve been reading on the back of cards since we could read.


they are not but i have watched nearly every game they have played vs the reds and both players have just looked plain not the same
yes they reds pitching is better, but that is not the sole reason. players of their caliber do not just slump for an entire half of a season without something else contributing
        Top  
#734674 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:14:31
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
btw the rbi is one of the worst stats ever, it is so team dependent and shows absolutely nothing about a players particular skill level.
        Top  
#734685 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 22:02:54
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 22:14:31)
btw the rbi is one of the worst stats ever, it is so team dependent and shows absolutely nothing about a players particular skill level.


Adam Dunn would kiss you for this.
        Top  
#734702 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 23:02:30
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 19:12:32)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 20:58:23)
i can find anything i want in stats given enough obscure stats that no one ever needed in gauging players before the last 25 years (aka the computer generation).  still does not make every stat valid.

these stats can be good tools, but they are not some end all be all indicator you keep trying to make them out to be.  in fact they are more obscure than the time tested stats weve been reading on the back of cards since we could read.


they are not but i have watched nearly every game they have played vs the reds and both players have just looked plain not the same
yes they reds pitching is better, but that is not the sole reason. players of their caliber do not just slump for an entire half of a season without something else contributing


its called nagging injury, or slump, or who knows.
yes, slumps can last 2 months

This post has been edited by blind_chief on Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 23:03:12
        Top  
#734703 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 23:02:45
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 19:14:31)
btw the rbi is one of the worst stats ever, it is so team dependent and shows absolutely nothing about a players particular skill level.


random fact of the day - check
        Top  
#734720 | Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 23:58:43
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:58:23)
i can find anything i want in stats given enough obscure stats that no one ever needed in gauging players before the last 25 years (aka the computer generation).  still does not make every stat valid.

these stats can be good tools, but they are not some end all be all indicator you keep trying to make them out to be.  in fact they are more obscure than the time tested stats weve been reading on the back of cards since we could read.


I don't think you can call these sabermetrics all that obscure now. Sure they won't be on the back of baseball cards anytime soon, but most baseball fans are paying attention to them now.
        Top  
#734765 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 07:36:19
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:58:43)
Quote (blind_chief @ Mon - Jul 19 2010 - 21:58:23)
i can find anything i want in stats given enough obscure stats that no one ever needed in gauging players before the last 25 years (aka the computer generation).  still does not make every stat valid.

these stats can be good tools, but they are not some end all be all indicator you keep trying to make them out to be.  in fact they are more obscure than the time tested stats weve been reading on the back of cards since we could read.


I don't think you can call these sabermetrics all that obscure now. Sure they won't be on the back of baseball cards anytime soon, but most baseball fans are paying attention to them now.


still does not make it more applicable
        Top  
#734772 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 08:13:08
Group: Guest
Posts: 12,44310k
Joined: May 28 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,771.55
The most important stats in the game is BA and Runs. I think we can all agree on that.
        Top  
#734774 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 08:19:29
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 06:13:08)
The most important stats in the game is BA and Runs. I think we can all agree on that.


triples are pretty telling imo
        Top  
#734783 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 10:09:34
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
At the only day there is only one stat that truly matters...........
.
.
..

.
.
.

.
.

.
wins
and the reds have 10 more the cubs so fk off
        Top  
#734794 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 11:29:24
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 08:09:34)
At the only day there is only one stat that truly matters...........
.
.
..

.
.
.

.
.

.
wins
and the reds have 10 more the cubs so fk off


truer words have never been spoken
:(
        Top  
#734826 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:08:29
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
faggotry
        Top  
#734832 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:30:38
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:40:08)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 18:38:58)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:36:42)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 18:32:42)
The cubs are old and overpaid


sometimes i wonder about you


At least you have a great Manager.

Oh shi...

Ready for Sandberg to be your next Manager?


lou will be back, and sandberg is our future
thats OFC



User Image

Fat Lou announced retirement today. Told you.
        Top  
#734833 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:31:33
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:30:38)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:40:08)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 18:38:58)
Quote (blind_chief @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 21:36:42)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Sun - Jul 18 2010 - 18:32:42)
The cubs are old and overpaid


sometimes i wonder about you


At least you have a great Manager.

Oh shi...

Ready for Sandberg to be your next Manager?


lou will be back, and sandberg is our future
thats OFC



User Image

Fat Lou announced retirement today. Told you.


A common theme for joe ;)

He should have stayed in Cinci and built a legacy
        Top  
#734837 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:56:18
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
just hatin on the joes
        Top  
#734844 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 18:26:23
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
Quote (randomtask @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 17:56:18)
just hatin on the bros


        Top  
#734845 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 18:52:02
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
gn8 lou
        Top  
#734857 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 20:12:22
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
there is something most of you dont really understand about cub fans. its a curse really.

we are eternally optimistic. even when we know we are wrong we generally have to be optimistic. its all we have.

hope.
        Top  
#734858 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 20:14:31
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 21:12:22)
there is something you can't understand....

HOW I COULD JUST, KILL A MAN!!!!!!!





        Top  
#734859 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 20:22:38
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 18:14:31)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 21:12:22)
there is something you can't understand....

HOW I COULD JUST, KILL A MAN!!!!!!!





i listened to the rage cover of that song today
        Top  
#734860 | Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 20:24:02
Group: Members
Posts: 18,44410k
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,262.32 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 21:22:38)
Quote (sardoniclysane @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 18:14:31)
Quote (blind_chief @ Tue - Jul 20 2010 - 21:12:22)
there is something you can't understand....

HOW I COULD JUST, KILL A MAN!!!!!!!





i listened to the rage cover of that song today



It's a great cover. Gets me pumped up. I love blasting some Rage in the gym.
Views: 5292 | Replies: 80 | Sports Topic List
Page 2 of 2 - 1 2
 
Quit the Internet