Desolate Carnage
Page 2 of 7 - 1 2 34»
 
Itt: +1
Archived | Views: 10250 | Replies: 312 | Started 16 years, 11 months ago
 
#160936 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:28:56
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:26:53)
Chris Paul is better because he plays defense and isn't on a team with all stars.

Argument over.

Nash makes them all-stars.
But definitely agree with the CP3 defense thing, which is huge. And the fact that he's having a better year.
 
#160938 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:29:12
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
pg2
 
#160939 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:29:13
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
FIRST

This post has been edited by ppkpkppk on Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:29:23
 
#160940 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:29:36
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
This post has been edited by ppkpkppk on Jan 25 2008 - 10:29:23
 
#160942 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:30:39
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
CP does infact play better defense. But the suns don't actually want to play d. they want to play some aba-style bball. which nash fits perfectly.
 
#160943 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:31:07
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Marion and Amare would be fine without Nash, and Charlotte's record would be even better than it is if CP3 played with Marion and Amare
 
#160948 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:33:29
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
they may be fine, but they would not be getting the offensive numbers they get now.
 
#160950 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:33:59
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:30:39)
CP does infact play better defense. But the suns don't actually want to play d. they want to play some aba-style bball. which nash fits perfectly.

CP3 plays great defense. But yea, I agree that Nash is definitely better for the personnel on the Suns. I mean CP3's got a ways to go to be considered as good a distributor as Nash.
 
#160956 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:35:42
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:33:59)
Quote (blind_chief @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:30:39)
CP does infact play better defense.  But the suns don't actually want to play d.  they want to play some aba-style bball.  which nash fits perfectly.

CP3 plays great defense. But yea, I agree that Nash is definitely better for the personnel on the Suns. I mean CP3's got a ways to go to be considered as good a distributor as Nash.

he does more with less, I don't see why you guys think Marion / Amare are mere products of Nash's passing
 
#160963 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:37:48
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:35:42)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:33:59)
Quote (blind_chief @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:30:39)
CP does infact play better defense.  But the suns don't actually want to play d.  they want to play some aba-style bball.  which nash fits perfectly.

CP3 plays great defense. But yea, I agree that Nash is definitely better for the personnel on the Suns. I mean CP3's got a ways to go to be considered as good a distributor as Nash.

he does more with less, I don't see why you guys think Marion / Amare are mere products of Nash's passing

They'd be all-stars on their own(Amare definitely, :donno: about Marion). They're at the level they are at because of Nash's passing. Just look at what happened to that team when Nash was injured the last few seasons.
 
#160965 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:38:32
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 07:35:42)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:33:59)
Quote (blind_chief @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:30:39)
CP does infact play better defense.  But the suns don't actually want to play d.  they want to play some aba-style bball.  which nash fits perfectly.

CP3 plays great defense. But yea, I agree that Nash is definitely better for the personnel on the Suns. I mean CP3's got a ways to go to be considered as good a distributor as Nash.

he does more with less, I don't see why you guys think Marion / Amare are mere products of Nash's passing

If cp was on a run and gun style team, a la suns, he would not get the numbers personally, nor the numbers for his teammates. Not that he is worse, but he is not the passer Nash is. CP is probably the better player though for traditional styles of offense.
 
#160972 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:16
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
I don't understand why everyone is always riding Nash's dick when the Suns won't ever win anything if they can't play defense. I hope the Hornets match up vs them round 1 and see an early exit.

this whole debate is more ridiculous than the "PATRIOTS ARE A CLASSLESS DIRTY TEAM" spiel
 
#160973 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:59
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:16)
I don't understand why everyone is always riding Nash's dick when the Suns won't ever win anything if they can't play defense. I hope the Hornets match up vs them round 1 and see an early exit.

this whole debate is more ridiculous than the "PATRIOTS ARE A CLASSLESS DIRTY TEAM" spiel

Cuz they are so fucking good at offense.
 
#160975 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:43:56
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:59)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:16)
I don't understand why everyone is always riding Nash's dick when the Suns won't ever win anything if they can't play defense.  I hope the Hornets match up vs them round 1 and see an early exit.

this whole debate is more ridiculous than the "PATRIOTS ARE A CLASSLESS DIRTY TEAM" spiel

Cuz they are so fucking good at offense.

is this the Suns or the Patriots, I honestly couldn't tell
 
#160976 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:44:46
Group: Members
Posts: 11,32610k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 2,118.11 $
Raja Bell and Shawn Marion can d up
 
#160977 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:45:03
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:43:56)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:59)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:42:16)
I don't understand why everyone is always riding Nash's dick when the Suns won't ever win anything if they can't play defense.  I hope the Hornets match up vs them round 1 and see an early exit.

this whole debate is more ridiculous than the "PATRIOTS ARE A CLASSLESS DIRTY TEAM" spiel

Cuz they are so fucking good at offense.

is this the Suns or the Patriots, I honestly couldn't tell

Well Suns.
But Patriots can be described in the same manner.
 
#160978 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:46:01
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (bubbachunk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:44:46)
Raja Bell and Shawn Marion can d up

so can Amare, but apparently Passing wins games
 
#160980 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:46:04
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (bubbachunk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:44:46)
Raja Bell and Shawn Marion can d up

Its not enough, especially with Amare not really being able to control the paint.
 
#160981 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:47:30
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:46:04)
Quote (bubbachunk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:44:46)
Raja Bell and Shawn Marion can d up

Its not enough, especially with Amare not really being able to control the paint.

What I mean by that is that he's real good, but he's always gonna be smaller then the opposing big men.
 
#160983 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:48:27
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
I would bet on the Hornets in a playoff series vs the Suns
 
#160984 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:01
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:48:27)
I would bet on the Hornets in a playoff series vs the Suns

Not a chance right now.
 
#160985 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:13
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
it just occured to me that they are not the Charlotte Hornets, this is not 1998
 
#160987 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:29
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:01)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:48:27)
I would bet on the Hornets in a playoff series vs the Suns

Not a chance right now.

That is barring injuries ofc.
 
#160990 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:51:15
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
I'm only 13 back. Nice.
 
#160991 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:51:57
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 07:50:13)
it just occured to me that they are not the Charlotte Hornets, this is not 1998

handclap.jpg
 
#160992 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:52:30
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:01)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:48:27)
I would bet on the Hornets in a playoff series vs the Suns

Not a chance right now.

2-0 in the season series, why not.

CP3 > Canadian
 
#160993 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:52:36
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (blind_chief @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:51:57)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 07:50:13)
it just occured to me that they are not the Charlotte Hornets, this is not 1998

handclap.jpg

Kek
 
#160994 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:53:19
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:52:30)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:50:01)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:48:27)
I would bet on the Hornets in a playoff series vs the Suns

Not a chance right now.

2-0 in the season series, why not.

CP3 > Canadian

They're not talented enough.
The Suns can run n gun past anybody but the Spurs.
 
#160996 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:53:47
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Btw, wonder if trolling GH for the next 6 hours is enough to earn me a GIANT POOP ON MY FACE.
 
#160998 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*
 
#161000 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:34
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01)
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*

They did against the Lakers.
 
#161001 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 10:58:09
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:34)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01)
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*

They did against the Lakers.

the Los Angeles Kobe Bryants are not as complete a team as the Hornets
 
#161006 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:03:03
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:58:09)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:34)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01)
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*

They did against the Lakers.

the Los Angeles Kobe Bryants are not as complete a team as the Hornets

'05 - '06 Lakers weren't that bad.
 
#161009 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:05:04
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
6 posts to go
 
#161011 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:05:36
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:03:03)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:58:09)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:34)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01)
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*

They did against the Lakers.

the Los Angeles Kobe Bryants are not as complete a team as the Hornets

'05 - '06 Lakers weren't that bad.

"weren't that bad" isn't much of a compliment
 
#161017 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:09:03
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:05:36)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:03:03)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:58:09)
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:34)
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 10:56:01)
they can't run and gun past any team that knows how to D up*

They did against the Lakers.

the Los Angeles Kobe Bryants are not as complete a team as the Hornets

'05 - '06 Lakers weren't that bad.

"weren't that bad" isn't much of a compliment

werd, I still got faith in the Suns against anybody but the Spurs though.
 
#161018 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:10:07
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Make sure before spamming 7_deadly's pm box, you read his profile.
 
#161019 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:11:45
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
k
 
#161020 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:12:30
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
afk
 
#161021 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:12:49
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Keep it spammin'
 
#161022 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:12:59
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
ya
 
#161023 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:13:16
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
k
 
#161024 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:13:44
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Tied for top spammer.
 
#161025 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:13:57
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
We're spammin'
I wanna spam it with you,
We're spammin', spammin'
And I hope you like spammin' too
 
#161026 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:14:33
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (StQ @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:13:57)
We're spammin'
I wanna spam it with you,
We're spammin', spammin'
And I hope you like spammin' too

I am numba 1
 
#161027 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:14:42
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
tl,dr= +1
 
#161028 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:15:02
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
k
 
#161029 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:15:03
Group: Members
Posts: 16,11910k
Joined: Oct 26 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,371.50 $
Quote (Vogan @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:14:42)
tl,dr= +1

Your fellow countrymen are faggots.
 
#161030 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:15:23
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
Quote (ppkpkppk @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:15:03)
Quote (Vogan @ Jan 25 2008 - 11:14:42)
tl,dr= +1

Your fellow countrymen are faggots.

SAD BUT TRUEEEE
 
#161031 | Fri - Jan 25 2008 - 11:16:00
Group: Members
Posts: 24,89920k
Joined: Sep 1 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 44.40
lol
Archived | Views: 10250 | Replies: 312 | General Archive - 2008 Topic List
Page 2 of 7 - 1 2 34»
 
Quit the Internet