Desolate Carnage
 
Aliens
Archived | Views: 1955 | Replies: 20 | Started 13 years, 9 months ago
 
#784910 | Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 14:27:05
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
 
#784912 | Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 14:30:35
Group: Members
Posts: 74,76940k
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 7,730.25 $
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us
 
#784917 | Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 14:46:16
Group: Members
Posts: 27,88820k
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 381.50 $
“[The Journal of Cosmology] isn’t a real science journal at all,” says PZ Meyers in Science Blogs, “but is the ginned-up website of a small group of crank academics obsessed with the idea of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe that life originated in outer space and simply rained down on Earth.”
So there you have it — this is either reality-altering news, or the work of kooks. Our hearts believe, but our brains are kind of bummed.
 
#784918 | Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 15:02:32
Group: Members
Posts: 5,333
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 332.15
Any doubt of other life is just selfishness.
 
#785162 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 18:07:53
Group: Guest
Posts: 14,41410k
Joined: Oct 2 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 1,162.65
looks like shit
 
#785168 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 18:18:09
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 11:30:35)
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us


nasa > you
 
#785218 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:07:00
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 01:18:09)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 11:30:35)
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us


nasa > you


ofc, task would never come up with a plan to completely waste few trillion dollars only in few decades
 
#785223 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:14:31
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:07:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 01:18:09)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 11:30:35)
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us


nasa > you


ofc, task would never come up with a plan to completely waste few trillion dollars only in few decades


i think its like 700 bil, adjusted for inflation
in comparison, our "wars on terror" cost over a trillion
 
#785225 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:15:27
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
actually, i think thats possibly just the space shuttle portion
either way the war is bleeding us dry and we blame it on the low/middle class
lol america
america lol
 
#785226 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:16:18
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 02:14:31)
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:07:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 01:18:09)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 11:30:35)
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us


nasa > you


ofc, task would never come up with a plan to completely waste few trillion dollars only in few decades


i think its like 700 bil, adjusted for inflation
in comparison, our "wars on terror" cost over a trillion


war on terror had some effect (no matter if it's good or bad), nasa's program through out all this years was almost completely worthless
 
#785228 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:17:57
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:16:18)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 02:14:31)
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:07:00)
Quote (blind_chief @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 01:18:09)
Quote (randomtask @ Sun - Mar 6 2011 - 11:30:35)
we found some worthless shit that means nothing, fund us


nasa > you


ofc, task would never come up with a plan to completely waste few trillion dollars only in few decades


i think its like 700 bil, adjusted for inflation
in comparison, our "wars on terror" cost over a trillion


war on terror had some effect (no matter if it's good or bad), nasa's program through out all this years was almost completely worthless


dude, nasa invented velcro
 
#785229 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:19:03
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
in all honesty nasa, or the space program, has had tremendous influence in our technology
i cant imagine our world if we stopped pure science (or at least our greatest attempt at honest science for the sake of learning, clearly profits)
 
#785230 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:19:25
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
googling what velcro is
 
#785231 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:20:11
Group: Guest
Posts: 7,189
Joined: Mar 13 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 0.00
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:19:25)
googling what velcro is


dude
 
#785232 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:20:34
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:19:25)
googling what velcro is


lol
 
#785233 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:23:19
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
i'm clearly saying that there shouldn't be a space program, but amount of resources spent by nasa just to achieve same or worse effect then russian space program is ridiculous
i believe researching and producing docking system cost ten times more for nasa then for russians and in the end everyone admit that it's overcomplicated and clearly particulary effective as russian

aka: nasa=total fail
 
#785236 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:30:08
Group: Members
Posts: 11,60310k
Joined: Mar 31 2008
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 351.45
nasa gave us an awesome pen too bro

also shit space is the greatest thing ever
 
#785237 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:30:42
Group: Guest
Posts: 7,189
Joined: Mar 13 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 0.00
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:23:19)
i'm clearly saying that there shouldn't be a space program, but amount of resources spent by nasa just to achieve same or worse effect then russian space program is ridiculous
i believe researching and producing docking system cost ten times more for nasa then for russians and in the end everyone admit that it's overcomplicated and clearly particulary effective as russian

aka: nasa=total fail


you don't know what velcro is, your argument is invalid
 
#785243 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:35:47
Group: Members
Posts: 30,24630k
Joined: Oct 5 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 3,287.80 $ $
Quote (hippie @ Wed - Mar 9 2011 - 02:30:42)
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:23:19)
i'm clearly saying that there shouldn't be a space program, but amount of resources spent by nasa just to achieve same or worse effect then russian space program is ridiculous
i believe researching and producing docking system cost ten times more for nasa then for russians and in the end everyone admit that it's overcomplicated and clearly particulary effective as russian

aka: nasa=total fail


you don't know what velcro is, your argument is invalid


:(
 
#785251 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 21:14:48
Group: Members
Posts: 74,19840k
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 6,883.75 $ $
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 16:23:19)
i'm clearly saying that there shouldn't be a space program, but amount of resources spent by nasa just to achieve same or worse effect then russian space program is ridiculous
i believe researching and producing docking system cost ten times more for nasa then for russians and in the end everyone admit that it's overcomplicated and clearly particulary effective as russian

aka: nasa=total fail


its clearly that "nasa" is inefficient, but rather american policies at the highest levels are corrupt (but then again this is clearly due to our system but rather how all people in power deal with that power). once a given company gets a huge government contract (military, scientific etc) they will do everything in their power to clearly lose that contract. so the next thing you know 10 years have gone by and the same contract exists.

its 2011 and we are just now doing away with the space shuttle. its based on tech from the 70s (sure, things get updated, but thats clearly the point). and i think nasa has known since the 90s that its time to upgrade to something more efficient. but they couldnt, or wouldnt, because that upsets the apple cart.
 
#785260 | Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 23:50:04
Group: Guest
Posts: 3,212
Joined: Dec 16 2007
Contact: Offline PM
Points: 21.95
Warn: 10% [ warn bar ]
Quote (hippie @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:30:42)
Quote (Vogan @ Tue - Mar 8 2011 - 19:23:19)
i'm clearly saying that there shouldn't be a space program, but amount of resources spent by nasa just to achieve same or worse effect then russian space program is ridiculous
i believe researching and producing docking system cost ten times more for nasa then for russians and in the end everyone admit that it's overcomplicated and clearly particulary effective as russian

aka: nasa=total fail


you don't know what velcro is, your argument is invalid


LOL
Archived | Views: 1955 | Replies: 20 | General Archive Topic List
 
Quit the Internet