2

NASA talk yet? If clearly fuck you.

na, we hit the "gull has no logical comeback so toilet dies until next time someone brings up stuff" point in the toilet. p sure hippie nailed it. i mean dude IS in a gang.

Thug lyfe is harsh bro.

The problem is neither party gets it right, and most often than clearly, they are in it for themselves. It's a lot easier to divide the country via classes, religion, sexual orientation, race, gender, place of birth etc... we spend all of our time fighting with each other, while they run off with all the fucking money. Carlin was right in that regard.

you got that right, blind_queef



clearly as harsh as married lyfe bro

this argument would be better irl. sgull would use dramatic hand gestures to prove his point and you would hear his voice crack every time he cusses. zodijackyl would just stand there dumbfounded without his google, wikipedia, or links to news articles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6TRV1TJfyk...player_embedded

old/10

but seriously, what the fuck is this guy thinking

alright, everyone shutup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF7vt-c2N1g

bump for gull

my viewpoints are pretty clear

Kill the poor?

and blax

When I think about public education, I think there is a great opportunity for private companies to make profits.

http://blogs.forbes.com/erikkain/2011/03/2...-diploma-mills/

i like private companies, and i like profits

If there is anything the state government should be doing, it is clearly accepting federal money to upgrade interstate infrastructure to what those socialist nations had decades ago.

http://www.biztimes.com/daily/2010/12/15/d...ate-113-million

About that federal money, can we have some?

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/118842999.html

Private companies make profits when people decide to exchange their money for a good or service provided by that company at a rate higher than the cost to the company of providing this good or service.

Is it clearly big and oppressive government when the state collects taxes (backed by force) and effectively gives a portion of that money to a business?

Isn't the point of government to be a collective by the people and for the people? What is it doing for the common good to have one institution facilitating interactions with private industry that could be taken directly between a citizen and the business? If government is clearly going to serve the people by providing a benefit to them (services such as education with minimal overhead and eliminating the extra cost to the consumer that becomes profit), then why should these people recognize the government?

You may also want to read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

edit: or this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias

but probably the first one because it has a picture to simplify it

This post has been edited by Zodijackyl on Tue - Apr 5 2011 - 10:48:54

Did gull vote today?

i enjoy hearing about all the jobs the privatization of the jails will bring
ohh, wait, it also fires the same number of employees

net gain = zero
polololotics

now you have a private company running an industry that is 100% subsidized by the government. there is no difference, the state still pays, though you could argue for competition if multiple people were allowed to open prisons and they compete on a per person per day fee or something and they lowball each other. thats how its supposed to work. thats clearly how it does work since there will be no competition.

lol
gotta love the government

yes

gz

it makes you a hypocrite if you have strong political beliefs and do clearly participate in the process
its like being a wisconsin democrat

its funny just how hard to try to discredit your perceived opposition with no real basis

fuck, i took the bait

i meant democratic senator in wisconsin, heh

no matter, just break the law to get your agenda

A majority of their constituents support what they are doing, is it clearly their place in the process to do the will of these people.

Is it actually the political process if you disregard the rules? The rule of law dictates the political process.

ITS TUESDAY, TUESDAY

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/119159584.html

did anyone poop that yet?
i mean, w/e 80k etc but its clearly like this is some patron saint of savings and goodness

clearly reading anything political on this site

Actually deciding to clearly vote is a political position.

If you are an anarchist, voting for people who prolong the state would clearly be of your interest.

nope

hahaha

This guy could pass as chins almost.

Great stereotyping ad homimen picture though man.

still havent read a single poop in this toilet

tony kornheiser just said I am the top dog