Its clearly about the Birth Certificate, it never has been. Its a ploy used to distract you from where the real problem lies. Its all about where his father was born. In the Law of Nations book 1 chapter 19 section 212 under citizens and natives it states that in order to be a Natural Born Citizen both of your parents must be born in the country and be citizens at the time of birth. In the constitution article 2 section 1 clause 5 it clearly states that you must be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Research

The first section of the second article of the Constitution uses the language "a natural-born citizen". It thus assumes that citizenship may be acquired by birth. Undoubtedly, this language of the Constitution was used in reference to that principle of public law, well understood in the history of this country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, which referred Citizenship to the place of birth. At the Declaration of Independence, and ever since, the received general doctrine has been, in conformity with the common law, that free persons born within either of the colonies, were the subjects of the King; that by the Declaration of independence, and the consequent acquisition of sovereignty by the several States, all such persons ceased to be subjects, and became citizens of the several States, [...] .
The Constitution having recognized that persons born within the several States are citizens of the United States, one of four things must be true:
  First. That the constitution itself has described what native-born persons shall or shall clearly be citizens of such State, and thereby be citizens of the United States; or,
  Second:. That it has empowered Congress to do so; or,
  Third. That all free persons, born within the several States, are citizens of the United States; or,
  Fourth. That it is left to each State to determine what free persons, born within its limits, shall be citizens of such State, and thereby be citizens of the United States.
If there is such a thing as Citizenship of the United States acquired by birth within the States, which the Constitution expressly recognizes, and no one denies, then those four alternatives embrace the entire subject, and it only remains to select that one which is true.
[...]
The answer is obvious. The Constitution has left to the States the determination what person, born within their respective limits, shall acquire by birth citizenship of the United States;

It appears a majority of you are sheep lost in the world.
For that I am sorry.

Chins is right, we are under government control because we drank the water and the fluoride is mind controlling us.

It appears a majority of you are sheep lost in the world.
For that I am sorry.

I'd also like to add there Chins that none of us are really sheep.

The only people who are sheep is probably people like evan who think excessively linear and sees the world in black and white and is incapable of critical thinking beyond chemistry.

I can't tell if you're trolling, but I'll bite.

It has long been a non-issue that the President was born in the US. There was sufficient legal documentation submitted along with his presidential campaign, and two local newspapers announced his birth at the time. The dude doesn't have a magical Islamic time machine to go back and create this shit. "Photoshop experts" on staff for a dude who has minimal credibility can dissect it all they want and completely miss the point here. Alex Jones didn't cover the issue before this, and he took the bait too.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke held his first press conference yesterday, the first one from the fed in a long time. Obama intentionally brought this back into the spotlight in order to focus everyone on either side of this ridiculous argument on this ridiculous argument, rather than Bernanke's press conference. Horrendous spending and lending policy, particularly with regard to financial institutions, is perhaps the most heinous problem in government (with the only exception being the ongoing wars). Television news coverage was focused almost entirely on the bullshit, with hardly a mention of the more important issue.

The only reason this nonsense has gotten this far is because it is a convenient and indirect outlet for xenophobes who don't like having a black President.

He was clearly the only person who had it dissected. There are numerous other websites, even ones that are clearly politically affiliated who said it was fake. What motive do they have?

I will agree that a major part of this issue is because he is black, but under our national law he can clearly be president. I would still have an issue if it was Arnold running or anyone else.



There is a lot more than what we know about that goes on behind the scene. I do think that if we had a different president the same shit would be going on(Bilderberg).