Might be one of the few things I can agree on from you.

magical pg 3 that joe didn't get omg

This post has been edited by sardoniclysane on Mon - Oct 22 2012 - 21:13:12

ill agree with you on anything advancing science and research

but that does clearly change the fact that it matters clearly for our national security. its like saying russia in 1975 is going to launch a missile at us. good, good for it. after we shoot your missile down we will fuck you in the ass with our 5000 mile cock. this is american exceptionalism. fuck you come at me.

clearly im coming after you because im scared.

This post has been edited by blind_chief on Mon - Oct 22 2012 - 21:14:37

No matter what we do in the middle east, that region will be in turmoil. that is all they know. Tyranny, killing over religion and boundaries, war, and rule via oppression and an iron fist. That is the history of that region for as long as we care to look back.

Hell it probably happened even with homo sapiens neanderthalus and homo sapiens

the china part of the topic
they scare me, but they are so heavily invested we scare them

in short, fuck all

Wait, are you saying that as if it is 1975? Even know our capabilities of showing down icbms is clearly anywhere as near as good as your analogies dictates.

Also once one fires, you are looking at ww3. It's clearly like it would end there. It wouldn't. There is a reason why we want to reduce nukes. They are the proverbial bull in a china shop.

Joe is reminding me of one of my favorite professors from collage, essentially he was a cold war relic as well (but a few years ahead of me). And his lectures were all about "merica fuck yeah!"

the idea china would tell us to i shit my pan­ts is about as absurd as the idea we would tell them to i shit my pan­ts (until, that is, the fed owns more of our dept than they do)

im always torn playing a stereotype and playing my views
im sorry, i love you

honestly China is clearly scarey.

Why? They are just smaller versions of us anymore. They've been assimilated, and at some point the communist regime will come down because year by year their hold on the populace is eroding.

They thought they could stay in power by becoming more capitalist, but by giving the public money, they gave them something other than the groupthink ideal that communism needs.

You don't introduce private property, individualism, and greed into a society like that and clearly have the people continue to strain against their bonds. IT just makes it worse for the powers that be to maintain.

20 years from now that government will either collapse or shift to some form of representative democracy. China is a non-issue.

private sector will never lead in research, because the risks are unquantifiable.

that is why we need government spending into science and technology. It really is that
simple.

add to that that the fed will own more of our dept and lol china

finally romney touches on research

basically i got that govt spending for universities and think tanks are good, but clearly for corporations

i'm good with it

You are a bigger fool than joe for drinking last night.

Romney has all but admitted he will cut government spending on science and research.


Fuck it, vote for him and when you're jobless I will laugh.

This post has been edited by sardoniclysane on Mon - Oct 22 2012 - 21:28:48

ill drink anything mitt says because hes white
/said evan

LOL MODERATOR


I think we all love teachers.

i thought obama said in the last debate that manufacturing jobs are lost

He's been saying he will bring them back. If you look at the last toilet Joe and I had a little back and forth on that idea.

the most intelligent person i know irl is ok with mitt being a flopper because "its what politicians do". i find this a convenient copout. its clearly that every politician lies, its that no one has ever been like mitt in recent memory. this man says whatever because he thinks you are a fucking idiot and cant remember yesterday.

hes just done such a terrible job so far... how can i vote him in again

He said some were lost, and it's true. clearly all can come back.

You need to know more people irl imho

you are a fox drone if you think hes done a "terrible job"
how can you clearly see that?

I'm glad I'm watching the Giants game instead, looks like I'm missing precisely nothing

Well, unemployment is down from the start of his presidency for starters.

(Contrary to what that idiotic commercial will tell you).

He also has constantly been trying to increase funding in science and tech, but has been blocked by the tea-bagger controlled congress. You say you are for science funding, but want to elect a Joe Smither who is against it?



Sometimes it really is that simple Evan.

ill give him credit for having the most logical "obama is a bad leader" argument. and hes clearly sold on mitt but obama is clearly selling him either.

You didn't miss much tbh. They were similar in FP, just different in methodology.

Also they kept steering the convo to economics.

tea baggers are the problem with the last 4 years
ill go to my grave with this

It sounds like there was 0 new content

There are pretty strong reasons clearly to vote for Obama, until you look closer. He has been hamstrung the last two years due to the midterm elections and the staunch stance from the other side that they will get rid of him at all costs outside of assassination. Obama's first two years were clearly good, and it was enough to fuel the fire to get the tea-bag party the momentum to make these last two years essentially a do nothing period for the government. Shame to be honest. The more I hear from Obama, the more I wish he had a government he could work with.

I'll tea-bag you, and you'll like it.

'Merica

Probably.

Essentially I don't see how this will sway undecideds. My mind was made up a while ago, as I'm sure all of DC's was as well.

the only thing im decided on is no romney
i cant decide on obama or 3rd party

Also, it's hilarious to believe that budgets, military or otherwise, are the presidents fault.

Romney really did look dumb about this point.

Jill hasn't impressed me enough to vote for her. Obama it is.

This will mark the first time I have ever voted for a non-republican.

That's how far off base that party is anymore.

How do you honestly know these people in the poll are really "uncommited"

I call bs. There is no way to filter selection bias.

i have clearly voted dem since 96. im leaning to dems just because the repubs want an oligopoly.

because they make good tv

Green since 96 or...a wait, a former repub?

This post has been edited by sardoniclysane on Mon - Oct 22 2012 - 21:48:48

I guess. It just makes me angry.

how can anyone believe a neocon?

i could fluf this up but the fact remains, how can anyone believe a neocon

answer my question fucker

also how is the least important debate? How do they define that?????

My owners will vote for Romney.

I can't understand how. I just can't.

I want to shake them and call them idiots.

But I like buying things.

I'd have sex with Norah. But I wouldn't call her the next day.

i believe everyone is conservative (aka save more than spend). but politics change that, or rather highlight what people find important.
i feel like this is an essay in thought that i cant condense into a few sentences. in short, no, fuck trickle down and fuck the vague argument about "taxes hinder investment"
*replacement taxes with regulation

norah jones?

Further proof we are far too alike. Former conservatives turned "liberals". You know what I find odd about this? Generally you start liberal, and become conservative as you age.

We're doing it wrong.

I'd call her the next day.

rah rah ah ah ah

roma ro ma ma

ga ga oo la la